Talk:Orlando Pace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer review Orlando Pace has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
Peer review Orlando Pace has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Contents

[edit] NFL Street 2

This information is fairly irrelevant to the football player. On top of that, the section is uninformative and very specific to having knowledge of NFL Street. This information would be better suited in a "trivia" section or something of that nature.

[edit] 2002 Redskins Game

I could not find a reference to the tackle that is discussed in the article. I also couldn't find information that Bailey intercepted a pass during that game. 2002 NFL Game Center I'm thinking that this might not be factual information. --Pinkkeith 11:00, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 4.6 40 Speed

Prove it. Give me the quote or else it' bogus.

[edit] 40 Speed: Verification Needed

I do not doubt that Pace is highly athletic, and I will not even contest the fact that he is the most athletic offensive lineman in the NFL, even though that's a very subjective statement.

However, at 6'7, 325 pounds, it is simply impossible for him to run a 4.6 in the 40-yard dash. It's very common for highly athletic tight ends and defensive ends, all of whom would be 50+ pounds lighter to be unable to run a 4.6 in the 40-yard dash. For example, Mercedes Lewis, the 1st round pick by the Jacksonville Jaguars out of UCLA, only ran a 4.79.

I have deleted this in the Wiki article, because a claim that incredible simply must be verified with an external citation to a credible authority.

I will leave the other statements in doubt alone for the time being, but they need verification as well. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Holle012 (talkcontribs) 01:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC).

He ran a 4.85 to 4.99 during the NFL combin in '97. [1] I think there are a number of information in this article that isn't factual. --Pinkkeith 19:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)