User talk:Orbital
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Orbital and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
- Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
- Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Good luck!
[edit] No Prob
No prob, lemme know if you add any more Transformers stuff. I have lots of screen caps from my VCD of the TV episodes.
[edit] Devastator
Hi there - you're probably the one to ask about this. It looks to me like Devastator has too many right arms and not enough right legs. Am I right? EddEdmondson 16:32, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Ultra Magnus pics
Im dont think those screencaps are copyrighted, I mean I took mine from my own source. I would email Seibertron and ask them. If its about preservation Im sure they wouldnt have a problem you using them.
[edit] Wreckers (Transformers)
Where is this documented? I realize my expertise in Transformers is limited to G1 cartoon/comic, G2 comic and RiD, but have never heard of this. It vaguely sounds like it could be from the UK comic, which I am unfamiliar. Please enlighten. Thanks. --Plicease 05:27, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for your response Orbital. I also had a question on the Talk:Shockwave (Transformers) article, which I think you also originated. --plicease 04:58, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Sentinel Prime picture
Where did you get the picture of Sentinel Prime passing the Matrix to Optimus Prime? Is it from the UK comics? — JIP | Talk 09:50, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Redirect of Lists of songs about homosexuality
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lists of songs about homosexuality, by Pax:Vobiscum, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lists of songs about homosexuality is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lists of songs about homosexuality, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Lists of songs about homosexuality itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Female Transformers
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Female Transformers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The S 14:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ultramagnusdeath.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ultramagnusdeath.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 16:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Starsaber.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Starsaber.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:55, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Guardianrobots.jpg
I have tagged Image:Guardianrobots.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Omegasupreme.jpg
I have tagged Image:Omegasupreme.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:YoungA3.jpg
I have tagged Image:YoungA3.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Prime_dead.jpg
I have tagged Image:Prime_dead.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Wardawn01.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wardawn01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:16, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Starscreamg1.jpg
I have tagged Image:Starscreamg1.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 06:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Convoys.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Convoys.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Hate Plague
I have nominated Hate Plague, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hate Plague. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 07:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Autobot City
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Autobot City, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}}
to the top of Autobot City. Deb (talk) 20:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Superdimensional teleport gate
Another editor has added the {{prod}}
template to the article Superdimensional teleport gate, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}}
template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)