Talk:Orbirail
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It seems to me that this article has been overtaken by events to the point where it either needs to be rewritten or merged into London Overground as part of the history section. What is the consensus? --DanielRigal (talk) 16:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think that merging it with LO would be the best idea, as Obirail appears to have become LO. How about merging the LO History section with this? D-Notice (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- That is what I was thinking initially but now I am wondering about an alternative, which might be less disruptive to the London Overground article: How about we rename Orbirail to "Orbital railways in London" and take in the whole history of the outer circle lines (which is currently in Circle line but feels a bit out of place), the various Orbirail proposals and the creation of London Overground? --DanielRigal (talk) 13:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Although I am not sure where it will eventually end up, I am going to cobble something together in a history section. I will also change the rest so it is not misleading. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- AIUI from GLA/Mayoral documents, "Orbirail" is the concept, "London Overground" is the practice, ie. 'orbirail' wasn't planned to appear on stations or timetables. --AlisonW (talk) 22:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Orbirail is something I have found a bit hard to pin down. The article was never well referenced. If you know of any references to proposed revivals of the orbital routes (whether called Orbirail or not) which pre-date the Overground plans then that would be helpful. In particular, any suggestions pre-dating or very early in the history of TfL or the GLA would be interesting in order to track the development of the idea.
- Currently I have written/cobbled something in the History section which is a bit rambling and totally deficient in dates and references but it establishes a sort of narrative for the rise, fall and second rise of London's orbital routes. It is a probably too big to merge into London Overground. I will not have much time to work on it during the week so anybody who wants to hack it into a better shape is very welcome. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- I've definitely had early stuff discussing the Orbirail concept in the Mayor's draft transport plan well pre-Overground. Whether I still have it somewhere I'm not too certain, but I shall take a look. The 'orbirail' route though is what is now proposed for the final evolution of the Overground. --AlisonW (talk) 10:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- AIUI from GLA/Mayoral documents, "Orbirail" is the concept, "London Overground" is the practice, ie. 'orbirail' wasn't planned to appear on stations or timetables. --AlisonW (talk) 22:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Although I am not sure where it will eventually end up, I am going to cobble something together in a history section. I will also change the rest so it is not misleading. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- That is what I was thinking initially but now I am wondering about an alternative, which might be less disruptive to the London Overground article: How about we rename Orbirail to "Orbital railways in London" and take in the whole history of the outer circle lines (which is currently in Circle line but feels a bit out of place), the various Orbirail proposals and the creation of London Overground? --DanielRigal (talk) 13:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Not so fast! "Wikipedia is not a Crystal ball" applies here, as the Peckham-Clapham route for Overground is still only a plan and not a firm proposal. London Overground might never be what Orbirail was aspiring to, so the Orbirail article should remain for the foreseeable future. — MapsMan [ talk | cont ] — 17:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Could I suggest including a reference to Tokyo's Yamanote Line for a conceptual comparison? This also helps to explain the possible economic benefits of orbirail: Presently London's zone 2 is constrained economically by the dominance of radial transport into overcrowded zone 1. Improved lateral transport around zone 2 could help develop multiple new economic centres like those found around the Yamanote line and reduce the pressure on zone 1.87.194.80.255 (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
