Talk:Orbea
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
Orbea → Orbea Bicycles – {Orbea is a plant,as is it links from taxon table to bikes? refering page:Asclepiadaceae} Halcyon 15:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC)Willy Wonka
[edit] Voting
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with
~~~~Name
- Support The use of an implicit branch to the Orbea page from page:Asclepiadaceae should be fixed by renaming the page:orbea for clarity. Halcyon 18:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC)Willy Wonka
- Oppose. The company name is simply Orbea, so naming the article Orbea Bicycles would be incorrect. Why not just create an article about the plant at Orbea (plant) or similar (are there any naming conventions for plants?). Then point the appropriate links there, and add an otheruses link to the top of this article. --Vclaw 14:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Nightstallion 09:10, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments
Google orbea - results include: virology, plants, cycling, search engine, A cuban school,
research orbea: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=orbea&btnG=Search
IMO a non chauvinistic approach would be beneficial, sort of neutral. But it's not my say. --Halcyon 03:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)Willy Wonka
[edit] Orbea (Asclepiadaceae) Semi Resolution
The Asclepiadaceae page link has been changed to Orbea (Asclepiadaceae). Stylisticly it would still be better to have Orbea (bicycles), as it would be un-ambiguous to begin with, or encourage the shift/select through another screen. --Halcyon
Moved to Orbea (company) for neutrality's sake, I think a minor Basque company and a minor plant would deserve equal attention. Nightstallion 09:10, 13 January 2006 (UTC)