From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
??? |
This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
[edit] Disambiguation page?
Maybe this page should be a disambiguation (or similar) page rather than the article it is now. Why I'm suggesting this is simply the fact that it contains one line and two links to optical modulation techniques. Also there's not that much to be said about optical modulation. - JT 01:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
This page also needs, IMHO, to be renamed as "spatial light modulator". It's the most usual term for this item. --Patillotes (talk) 15:46, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Also needs a new subsection about "nematic liquid SLMs" and "ferroelectric" ones. --Patillotes (talk) 15:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I apologize for this, I'll crossed this topic's translation in my mother tongue with another one (SLMs). Its structure seem good for me. --Patillotes (talk) 15:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)