Ophryocystis elektroscirrha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ophryocystis elektroscirrha
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Protista
Phylum: Apicomplexa
Class: Gregarinia
Order: Neogregarinorida
Family: Olindiidae
Genus: Ophryocystidae
Species: O. elektroscirrha
Binomial name
Ophryocystis elektroscirrha
McLaughlin & Myers, 1970

Ophryocystis elektroscirrha is an obligate, neogregarine protozoan that infects monarch (Danaus plexippus) and queen (Danaus gilippus) butterflies. There are no other known hosts. The species was first discovered in Florida, around the late 1960s.[1]. Since then, it has been found in every monarch population examined to date, including monarchs sampled in North America, Hawaii, Australia, Cuba, Central and South America.

Dormant spores occur on the cuticles of butterflies, in between the butterfly's scales. They are small, brown or black objects about 1/100th of a butterfly scale.

Contents

[edit] Life cycle

O. elektroscirrha is usually transmitted from females to their offspring when the females scatter spores on the egg chorion and surface of milkweed leaves, the host plant of monarchs and queens, during oviposition, the process of laying eggs. The spores are then ingested by the larvae. Once in the gut, the spores open and emerging sporozoites penetrate the gut wall and migrate to the hypoderm (the layer of cells that secrete the cuticle), where they undergo two phases of vegetative reproduction. After the caterpillar pupates, O. elektroscirrha starts reproducing sexually. Three days before the adults emerge, developing parasite spores can be seen through the pupal integument. The adult butterflies emerge covered with spores, mostly on their abdomens. Parasites do not continue to replicate on adult butterflies and spores must be eaten by larvae to cause new infections.

[edit] Effect on individual butterflies

Because O. elektroscirrha is geographically widespread, it may have a long history of occurrence with monarch butterflies. Nevertheless, infection by OE can cause a range of lethal and sublethal effects, and parasitized monarchs have lower survival to adulthood, smaller adult body size, and shorter lifespans as adults. Studies designed to test the negative effects of OE on monarch fitness showed that these effects are more severe when monarchs ingest a higher initial dose of spores, and further depend on the larval instar (age) at inoculation, with animals infected at earlier instars suffering more from infection. Adult monarchs that emerge with high spore densities have decreased eclosion (emergence from pupae) success, smaller wingspans, and lower body masses than uninfected adults. Although monarch mating success decreases with higher parasite loads, females that survive long enough to mate and initiate egg production to not appear to experience a significant decline in lifetime fecundity, although they may be less active than uninfected females. Researchers have also shown that infected monarchs have lower flight performance (shorter duration of active flight and lower flight speeds) than uninfected butterflies.

[edit] Population variation in prevalence

The prevalence (proportion of butterflies infected) with OE is highly variable among wild monarch populations and appears to vary inversely with host migration distances. Monarchs in southern Florida and Hawaii that breed year-round (i.e. non-migratory populations) bear the highest parasite loads (over 70% heavily infected). Approximately 30% of monarchs from a migratory population in western North America are heavily infected. Less than 8% of monarchs from the eastern migratory population (longest-distance migrants) are heavily infected. These differences among populations have persisted for many years, and suggest an association between parasite transmission and host migratory ecology.

[edit] References

  1. ^ R. E. McLaughlin & J. Myers (1970). "Ophryocystis elektroscirrha sp. n. a neogregarine pathogen of the monarch butterfly Danaus plexippus (L.) and the Florida queen butterfly Danaus gilippus berenice Cramer". Journal of Protozoology 17: 300–305. 

[edit] External links