User talk:Opensolution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Opensolution, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date. -- Jreferee

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

MBisanzBot (talk) 19:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Quick.Cms

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Quick.Cms, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. NMChico24 04:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Quick.Cms

Quick.Cms, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Quick.Cms satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quick.Cms and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Quick.Cms during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Douglasmtaylor T/C 14:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Answer

I understand WP:COI. But please explain (there is no explanation till now) why another pages/programs/CMS have "advert" here like Cms CMSimple, Cubecart. Quick.Cms.Lite is free like CMSsimple, CubeCart ... and I dont see any reason to delete this article. Please explain it. I only see "deletion" information but no good explanation of this work. I understand that You are defending from SPAM etc. but as i said it is UNFAIR to delete Quick.Cms.Lite article when another very similar products are still here from long time.

[edit] Article recreation

A tag has been placed on Quick.Cms, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Quick.Cms is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Quick.Cms saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. The Evil Spartan 18:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Answer

I dont understand know anything. Here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Quick.Cms user JulesH said: "Non-English sources are fine, if that's all there is. Changing my opinion to weak keep on the basis of this source." Then we buy book, read article, translate and put here again but base on this article. We give book to "Bibliography" for a reliable source. Then what is again wrong?

[edit] AfD nomination of Quick.Cms

Quick.Cms, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Quick.Cms satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quick.Cms (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Quick.Cms during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Marwood 07:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Quick.Cms

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Quick.Cms, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Realkyhick 06:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Answer

Realkyhick - this is long story. All problems where about sources. We put 2 independent sources about Quick.Cms. This article is not advertisement. I dont want write over and over the same. Please read all topics and discussions about it. There was about 2-3 discussions about this article. One of Your admins delete this article and explain that he do it because this article have been deleted before and he delete it again. Maybe this admin didn't read any discussion about this article and delete it. Opensolution 09:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

All freeware CMS systems in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_content_management_systems#Free_and_open_source_software have articles on wikipedia but ofcourse Quick.Cms.Lite will not. For me it is not fair :/