Operation Defensive Shield
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operation Defensive Shield (Hebrew: מבצע חומת מגן, Operation Defensive Wall) was a large-scale military operation conducted by the Israel Defense Forces in 2002, during the course of the Second Intifada. It was the largest military operation in the West Bank since the 1967 Six-Day War.
Operation Defensive Shield began on March 29th, 2002, with an incursion into Ramallah, followed by a domino of invasions into six of the largest cities in the West Bank, and their surrounding towns, villages and refugee camps. The Israeli Defense Forces invaded Tulkarm and Qalqilya on April 1st, Bethlehem the next day, and Jenin and Nablus the next. From April 3-21, the period was characterized by strict curfews on civilian populations and restrictions of movement of international personnel, including at times prohibition of entry to humanitarian and medical personnel as well as human rights monitors and journalists.[3]
According to The Guardian, during the three weeks of Operation Defensive Shield at least 500 Palestinians were killed and 1500 were wounded. According to the Palestinian Red Crescent over 4,258 people were detained by the Israeli military. The Israeli offensive left 29 Israeli soldiers dead, and 127 wounded. In addition to loss of life, massive economic losses due to destruction of property and the inability to reach workplaces were a major characteristic of this period.[4] The World Bank estimated that over $360 million worth of damage was caused to Palestinian infrastructure and institutions, $158 million of which came from the aerial bombardment and destruction of houses in Nablus and Jenin.[5] Large sectors of the Palestinian population were left homeless by the Operation. Long after Operation Defensive Shield was over, Palestinians spoke about the intensity of the closures during that period, and the Palestinian Authority did not manage to fully address damaged infrastructure for approximately two years after the invasions.
The UN report on the subject says, "Combatants on both sides conducted themselves in ways that, at times, placed civilians in harm's way. Much of the fighting during Operation Defensive Shield occurred in areas heavily populated by civilians and in many cases heavy weaponry was used."[6]
Contents |
[edit] Background
March and April of 2002 saw a dramatic increase of suicide bomb attacks against Israelis by Palestinian groups such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the Fatah-affiliated[7][8] Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades.[2] In March alone approximately 130 Israelis were killed in 13 attacks.[9] Suicide bombings on 9 March (q.v.),[10] and 20 March,[11] followed by a larger attack on 27 March,[2] an event known as the Passover massacre where 30 Israeli civilians were killed,[9] prompted the Israeli government to deploy the IDF on a wave of incursions into the West Bank, in what it considered a large-scale counter-terrorist offensive.[12][2] The Israel Defense Forces had issued emergency call-up notices for 20,000 reserve soldiers, the largest such call-up since the 1982 Lebanon War.[13][14]
The neutrality of this section is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page.(December 2007) Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. |
Sharon told his inner Cabinet in early March: "The Palestinians must be hit, and it must be very painful... We must cause them losses, victims, so that they feel a heavy price." Time Magazine reports that he repeated the statement to reporters in the Parliamentary cafeteria.[15] Time and other media outlets interpreted his comment as setting the tone for the Operation launched a little more than a month later, the broadest military offensive since the outbreak of violence in 2000.
[edit] Stated goals
The stated goals of the operation (as conveyed to the Israeli Knesset by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on April 8, 2002) were to "to catch and arrest terrorists and, primarily, their dispatchers and those who finance and support them; to confiscate weapons intended to be used against Israeli citizens; to expose and destroy facilities and explosives, laboratories, weapons production factories and secret installations. The orders are clear: target and paralyze anyone who takes up weapons and tries to oppose our troops, resists them or endangers them - and to avoid harming the civilian population." IDF officers also noted that incursions would force Palestinian militants "to exert their energy by defending their homes in the camps instead of by plotting attacks on Israelis."[16]
[edit] The operation
By April 3, the IDF was conducting major military operations in all Palestinian cities with the exception of Hebron and Jericho. The major points of conflict were:
During the operation, strict curfews were placed on at least six major Palestinian cities, resulting in complaints by human rights groups that essential medical attention was being denied to wounded, sick and elderly Palestinians, as well as complaints that Israel was practicing collective punishment, which is prohibited under the Fourth Geneva Convention. In some cities, there were scheduled breaks in the curfews. In others, curfews continued uninterrupted for a week or more.
Throughout the two weeks of fighting in Jenin and for a few days afterwards, the city and its refugee camp were under total closure. There was much concern at the time about possible human rights violations occurring in the camp. However, reports of a large-scale massacre there were found to be untrue, a result of confusion resulting from the Israeli refusal to allow entry to outside observers, and/or Palestinian media manipulation.[17] [18][19] The Jenin incursion battle saw heavy losses among the Israeli infantry as well as heavy Palestinian casualties.
The city of Bethlehem and its environs remained under curfew for five weeks, though there were periodic breaks, until an impasse involving Palestinian gunmen [5] who had seized the Church of the Nativity was resolved.[6] Most of the armed Palestinians in the Church of the Nativity agreed to go to the Gaza Strip. The rest were exiled to Cyprus.
In Ramallah, the IDF besieged Yasser Arafat's compound in an effort to isolate him physically and diplomatically.
The UN report on the subject noted: "It was not only the Palestinian people whose movement was restricted during Operation Defensive Shield. In many instances, humanitarian workers were not able to reach people in need to assess conditions and deliver necessary assistance because of the sealing of cities, refugee camps and villages during the operation. There were also cases of Israeli forces not respecting the neutrality of medical and humanitarian workers and attacking ambulances."[20]
In reply to these complaints, the Israeli army stated that the curfew was placed in order to prevent civilians from being caught in gunfights and getting hurt. Palestinian ambulances were stopped for checks following the discovery of an explosive belt in a Red Crescent ambulance.[21]
The operation officially ended on May 10, 2002, although occupations and curfews continued after that time, gradually tapering off. Shortly afterwards, Operation Determined Path was launched.
[edit] Public support
After Operation Defensive Shield, the number of suicide bombings in Israel subsequently decreased significantly, with the number of attacks in 2003 50 percent lower than in 2002,[citation needed] but it was not clear if the operation was the reason for this decrease. A poll conducted after the end of the operation indicated that 86 percent of Israeli Jews thought that the operation contributed to Israel's security. 54 percent thought the Operation has damaged Israel politically. In the final analysis, 90 percent of those surveyed asserted that the decision to launch Operation Defensive Shield was the correct decision.[citation needed] Views among Israeli Arabs were the opposite, with equally high numbers against the Operation.[citation needed]
[edit] Fact finding and criticism
A UN fact-finding mission was established under UN Security Council Resolution 1405 (April 19, 2002) into Operation Defensive Shield following Palestinian charges that a massacre had occurred in Jenin. In its attachment to the UN report the Palestinian Authority decried Israel's "culture of impunity" and called for "an international presence to monitor compliance with international humanitarian law, to help in providing protection to Palestinian civilians and to help the parties to implement agreements reached."[22] A report of the European Union attached in the report stated, "The massive destruction, especially at the centre of the refugee camp, to which all heads of mission in Jerusalem and Ramallah can testify, shows that the site had undergone an indiscriminate use of force, that goes well beyond that of a battlefield." [23]
Human Rights Watch determined that "Israeli forces committed serious violations of international humanitarian law, some amounting prima facie to war crimes." ([7])
Amnesty International reported that war crimes occurred in the Jenin refugee camp and in Nablus, including: unlawful killings; a failure to ensure medical or humanitarian relief; demolition of houses and property occurred (sometime with civilians still inside); water and electricity supplies to civilians were cut; torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment in arbitrary detention occurred; and Palestinians civilians were used for military operations or as "human shields." According to Amnesty, "the IDF acted as though the main aim was to punish all Palestinians." [24]
In a Haaretz editorial, Israeli journalist Amira Hass called the offensive "Operation Destroy the Data", criticizing the IDF for targetting computer files and printed records.[25]
[edit] Jenin massacre allegations
A great deal of the media attention to Operation Defensive Shield centered around Palestinians claims of a large scale massacre in Jenin and Palestinian cabinet minister Saeb Erekat was widely quoted by the press as saying there were 500 massacred Palestinians in the Israeli assault on Jenin.[26]
Initially Israel welcomed an investigation, announcing that it would cooperate fully with the Secretary General's fact-finding effort. According to the United Jewish Communities, Israel made a number of points regarding the team's methodology, in order to "safeguard the impartiality of its work."[27] Israeli receptivity to cooperating with the UN fact-finding mission changed after May 1, 2002, after Palestinian officials reduced the casualty toll in Jenin[28] to be between 50-60 deaths while Israel maintained there were only 7 or 8 civilian casualties. The charges of a massacre which had sparked demands for a U.N. investigation, had now been dropped. The U.N. Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, disbanded the U.N. fact-finding team in Jenin supposed to determine whether a massacre had taken place with the comment:"Clearly the full cooperation of both sides was a precondition for this, as was a visit to the area itself to see the Jenin refugee camp at first hand and to gather information. This is why the Secretariat engaged in a thorough clarification process with the Israeli delegation."[29]
[edit] References
- ^ Israeli Government Communique, April 21, 2002.
- ^ a b c d Report of Secretary-General on recent events in Jenin, other Palestinian cities August 1, 2002.
- ^ "Illegal Israeli actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory" ; Tenth emergency special session Agenda item 5, UN May 7 2002
- ^ "Illegal Israeli actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory" ; Tenth emergency special session Agenda item 5, UN May 7 2002 (all information above is from the report)
- ^ "Illegal Israeli actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory" ; Tenth emergency special session Agenda item 5, UN May 7 2002
- ^ "Illegal Israeli actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory" ; Tenth emergency special session Agenda item 5, UN May 7 2002
- ^ Palestinian Authority funds go to militants, BBC, November 7, 2003
- ^ Arafat Blames Israel for Tel Aviv Bombing, PMW, July 12, 2004
- ^ a b 'Major Ziv: A new wave of attacks is coming' (YNET)
- ^ Suicide bombing at Cafe Moment in Jerusalem (2002-03-09).
- ^ Bar-On, Mordechai (2006). Never-Ending Conflict: Israeli Military History. Stackpole Books, 236. ISBN 0811733459.
- ^ Statements by Israeli PM Sharon and DM Ben-Eliezer 29 Mar 2002
- ^ La Guardia, Anton (2003). War Without End: Israelis, Palestinians, and the Struggle for a Promised Land. St. Martin's Press, p. 348. ISBN 031231633X.
- ^ 'The Battle of Jenin' by By Matt Rees, May 13, 2002 (TIME), Also 'Untangling Jenin's Tale'
- ^ "We must cause them losses, victims, so that they feel a heavy price." Time Magazine 18th March 2002. Verified 18th May 2008.
- ^ Time Magazine: Streets Red With Blood
- ^ Palestinians confirm
no Jenin 'massacre' - ^ BBC News | MIDDLE EAST | 'No Jenin massacre' says rights group
- ^ USATODAY.com - U.N. report: No massacre in Jenin
- ^ "Illegal Israeli actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory" ; Tenth emergency special session Agenda item 5, UN May 7 2002
- ^ (Higgins, Alexander G., "International Red Cross says 'unacceptable' Israeli actions curbed its West Bank operations," Associated Press Newswires, 6 April 2002.)
- ^ "Illegal Israeli actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory" ; Tenth emergency special session Agenda item 5, UN May 7 2002
- ^ "Illegal Israeli actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory" ; Tenth emergency special session Agenda item 5, UN May 7 2002
- ^ Israel and the Occupied Territories Shielded from scrutiny: IDF violations in Jenin and Nablus. Amnesty International (2002-11-04). Retrieved on 2007-09-21.
- ^ Amira Hass: Operation Destroy the Data
- ^ CNN Transcripts: 'Interview with Condoleezza Rice; Last Chance for Arafat?; How to Best Protect the Cockpit?'
- "Mr. Erakat, you probably know that you've come under some widespread criticism here in the United States for initially charging that the Israelis were engaged in a massacre in Jenin. Perhaps 500 Palestinians murdered in that massacre, you suggested. But now all of the evidence suggests that perhaps 53 or 56 Palestinians died in that fighting in Jenin." - ^ The Israeli Cabinet Decision Regarding the UN Fact Finding Team, May 1, 2002
- ^ Paul Martin. "Jenin `massacre´ reduced to death toll of 56" (Reprint), PAGE ONE, The Washington Times, 2002-05-01, p. 01. Retrieved on 2007-09-17. (English)
Archived from Washington Times site; as retrieved from [1] [2][3][4] - ^ "Illegal Israeli actions in Occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory" ; Tenth emergency special session Agenda item 5, UN May 7 2002
[edit] External links
- Passover suicide bombing at Park Hotel in Netanya
- Israelbooks.com Goldenberg, Doron (2003). State of Siege. Gefen Publishing House.