User:Opabinia regalis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Meatspace is catching up to me, so I may not be as active as usual.

This is a Wikipedia user page.

If you were looking for the Cambrian fossil, you want this article: Opabinia regalis.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Opabinia_regalis.

My concessions to userboxes
My userpage looks less boring with a protein on it. So here's a DNA clamp. This is now a featured picture!
My userpage looks less boring with a protein on it. So here's a DNA clamp. This is now a featured picture!
This user is a member of the Molecular & Cellular Biology WikiProject
This user participates in the Science Collaboration of the Month.
This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
This user would rather write articles than play wiki-politics.

Proud product of the Cambrian explosion.

Contents

[edit] Subpages

/Article statistics (to be expanded) • /Awards/FA data (obsolete) • /Favorites/MediaWiki wishlist/Redlinks (create!) • /RfA criteria/Sandbox/To do

See also my new draft essay on puddingstone writing.

Not my subpage, but it's somebody's: This is a convenient place for a plug of my new favorite tool, User:Cacycle/wikEd. It's a spiffy little text editor tool that has a) text-finding in the edit window, and b) syntax highlighting that fades all the reference text. It's a little slow-loading for just posting this message, but it can be conveniently turned on and off, and thus improves the efficiency of editing even the most obnoxiously overcited, text-dense, overlong articles.

[edit] Articles I've worked on

This is as much a watchlist as anything else, so the probability that an article gets on here is directly proportional to how much I edited it and also to how likely it is to be vandalized/subject to edit creep, multiplied by a random value that serves as the laziness correction factor.

[edit] Protein structure and folding

accessible surface areaalpha helixalpha sheetalpha solenoidbeta barrelbeta hairpinbeta helixbeta-propeller domainbeta sheetconformational entropycontact orderdownhill foldingEF handfolding funnelglobin foldhelix bundlehelix-coil transition modelhomeodomain foldhydrophobic collapseleucine-rich repeatLifson-Roig modelnative contactpeptide plane flippingphi value analysispolyproline helixprimary structurequaternary structureRossmann foldsecondary structureStructural Classification of Proteinstertiary structurethioredoxin foldTIM barreltrefoil knot foldZimm-Bragg model

[edit] Proteins and complexes

aggrecanalpha secretaseamyloid precursor protein argonauteaspartokinasebarnasebarstarcapping enzymechalcone synthasechromodomaincleavage and polyadenylation specificity factorcleavage stimulatory factorcleavage factorcyclasedelta-cadinene synthasedicerDNA clamp droshaenhanceosomeF-box proteinFKBPflippasegankyringuanylyl transferaseheterogeneous ribonucleoprotein particlehslVU PABPIIparvulinpeptidyl-glutamyl peptide-hydrolyzingpilinpiwi piwi-interacting RNApolyadenine polymeraseprolyl isomeraseprotein K (gene expression)protein K (porin)Rop proteinS1 nucleasetubby proteinubiquitin-activating enzymeubiquitin-conjugating enzymevillin

[edit] Nucleic acids

antisense RNAbase pairpolypyrimidine tractpseudoknotRNA-induced transcriptional silencingRNA interference Image:LinkFA-star.pngSirna Therapeuticsstem-loopsystematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichmenttranscriptometransfer RNA

[edit] Computational biology

AccelrysCAFASPChou-Fasman methodchemical file formatcomputational phylogeneticscovariondead-end eliminationEVA (benchmark)Ewald summationforce field (chemistry)flying ice cubeglobal distance testGOR methodhomology modelingimplicit solvationLiveBenchloop modelingMODELLERmolecular dynamicsmolecular mechanicsmultiple sequence alignment Good articlephylogenetic treephylogenetics softwarePoisson-Boltzmann equationprotein structure predictionprotein-protein interaction predictionself-consistent mean field (biology)sequence alignment Image:LinkFA-star.pngsecondary structure predictionsequence alignment softwaresequence profiling toolstatistical potentialSTRIDE (protein)structural alignment Good articletree rearrangement

[edit] Cell biology

cell cyclecell nucleus Image:LinkFA-star.pngcrude lysateDNA repair Image:LinkFA-star.pngmalate-aspartate shuttlenuclease protection assayprocessivityproteasome Image:LinkFA-star.pngreporter gene

[edit] Chemistry/biochemistry

2-furanoneadenosine triphosphatealkalidebeta-peptidebutenolideCHAPS detergentexcimerhydrogen Image:LinkFA-star.pnglinamarinlist of standard amino acidsmicelleorthohydrogenprolineprotein Good article

[edit] Other biology

artificial selectionDavid Baker (biochemist)biochemistry of Alzheimer's diseaseDrosophila X virusGeoffrey Changcoalescent theorycrossbreedValerie Daggettgenegene fixationgenetics glossarykinomemating-type regionP22 phage

[edit] General Wikipedia-related opinions

  • Verifiability is a necessary but not sufficient condition for inclusion.
  • I don't understand why people like their userpages full of userboxes that say trivial things like "This user eats pizza." Does anyone care?
  • WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA are perfectly fine policies. Bludgeoning people over the head with them is just being passive-aggressive. For every one uncivil comment, there are ten more complaining about it.
  • On Wikipedia as it is in life: if your own business is insufficiently interesting, you feel compelled to mind everyone else's. The solution to this, of course, is to make your own business worth minding. Ideally, this involves writing an article.
  • We cannot have self-appointed civility police. If you feel compelled to appoint yourself as such, see above.
  • Trying to get a decision made around here is like trying to put socks on an octopus.
  • People should take internal drama a lot less seriously.

[edit] Empirical data

A lot of policies are made based on hand-waving arguments about what people might do, probably do, would do, could do, etc. (This is a general feature of governments.) I've made a few small, admittedly lame attempts at collecting empirical data about what people actually do.

  • Subject coverage: I had some spare time in which I could read but not edit, and felt like doing something more useful than twiddling my thumbs, so I did a random article survey and categorized the results by subject matter. See results here. Inspired by Rmhermen doing the same thing a long time ago. (This will be expanded at some point in the future.)
  • FA vandalism: On a similar note, a very limited survey of editing patterns on featured articles during their 24 hours of fame is here, in search of even sketchy evidence for or against the proposition that anonymous/new editors make substantial contributions to the day's FA that outweigh the influx of vandalism. (Discussion on this general subject here; this survey is obsoleted by this thorough analysis.)