Talk:Oneness (concept)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Spirituality.
This project provides a central approach to spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
There are too many conflicting views of Oneness, why can't we just have One?
If a person approaches the Bible with his or her preconceived ideas about the God (i.e. God is one Person) and force this doctrine into the Bible, you will get many different views. The best way would be to come to the Bible and believe what it reveals(i.e. God is triune).
One is a number, Oneness is being one with the "thing" or universe or god. Monkey Brain 22:23, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
There is a link on page "Ergot" that does not seem to belong.
I agree. It seems to be more correct to exclude it and have it be justified, then to leave it and question its existence, given its unexplained status and unclear linkage... other than the statement being overall, pretty trippy. - Some guy who was driven to will.
Hi
I just amended the intro to make it more precise. Oneness is primarily a New Age concept. Calling it spiritual is too vague since it does not apply to the majority of religious beliefs but is a dominant New Age concept. 81.77.52.93 23:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
