Talk:One Rincon Hill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One Rincon Hill has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

One Rincon Hill was a Arts good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: June 10, 2008

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

Architecture Portal This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale. This article is within the scope of the San Francisco Bay Area WikiProject, a collaborative effort to build a more detailed guide on Wikipedia's coverage of San Francisco and the Bay Area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. Architecture Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, which aims to create, expand, and maintain articles that relate to skyscrapers, high-rises and towers. To participate, visit the project page for more information. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the One Rincon Hill article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Contents 1 Hi, Skyscraper Phoenix 2 Future building tag 3 Semi-automatic peerreviewer javascript program suggestions 4 B Class Rating 5 Good article review 6 Comment

[edit] Hi, Skyscraper Phoenix

Hey there. I'm a reporter with a SF newspaper. While satisfying my curiosity about the Rincon Hill project, I came across this wiki page, and saw that you've been keeping a close eye on the construction site. Then I had a new subject to be curious about: who are you? Do you live in the neighborhood? Are you interested in architecture or construction? Are you affiliated with the project in some way? Just wondering. Best wishes, Eliza Littlelizajane 23:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Future building tag

After thinking about it for a few days, the One Rincon Hill article needs the 'future building' tag to be there on the top. This is because there are several aspects of the building which are speculative: the building's height, total height above sea level, and number of floors. For One Rincon Hill's height (south tower), there are two or three figures: 550', 605', and 641' (450', 465' and 541' for the north tower). The total height above sea level depends on how tall the building is. As for the number of stories, a quick search on google gives for the south tower: 54, 55, 60, 61, 62, 63, and 64 (44, 45 and 49 for the north tower). A discussion about the south tower's height could be found here. I just think there are too many possibilities out there for the building height and floors, so that is why I put back the tag. Hydrogen Iodide 18:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Semi-automatic peerreviewer javascript program suggestions

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.^[?]
• Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to wikicommons or integrating images with the text.^[?]
• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.^[?]
• Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.^[?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, SriMesh | talk 05:42, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] B Class Rating

The article meets the following five criteria:

1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited.

   

2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies.

   

3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.

   

4. It is free from major grammatical errors.

   

5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.

   

6. Overall:

   B Pass/Fail:

Upgraded quality rating from Start to B class. SriMesh | talk 22:42, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good article review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Many paragraphs / sections are one sentence long, can these be expanded? b (MoS): See above semi automatic peer reviewer.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): Quite a lot of work has been done in this regards over the last while.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   As per "quick-fail criteria" this article will need to await the finish of building construction to meet this criteria.

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

• The See also section has one internal wiki link. Check out the What links here. The wikipedia articles which link to One Rincon Hill in their articles, could be a source of additional information as an internal wiki link.

SriMesh | talk 01:55, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Comment

On the page for One Rincon Hill (in San Francisco) please change the architect name in left side bar to Solomon Cordwell Buenz. (not Solomon Cordwell Buenz & Associates).

Thank you, Stacy Connelly Marketing Manager Solomon Cordwell Buenz—Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.98.144.91 (talk) 16:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

_{(copied from WP:HD :) PeaceNT 17:03, 19 October 2007 (UTC))}