Talk:One: Kagayaku Kisetsu e
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Work in progress
I am currently fleshing this out. A lot of the information from this is coming directly from the Japanese Wikipedia article. - WrexSoul 08:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Voice actor links
If someone wants, please feel free to add this game to the voice actors linked through the characters section. Remember this spans two games, a drama CD, and an anime OVA, so if you do make sure the link goes in the right section. - WrexSoul 08:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Finished
And with that, I have finished copying all of the Japanese page that I consider worthwhile. I didn't translate the section on the OVA, but most of that was simply staff lists that would point to dead links anyway.
This could be improved by adding some pictures of the characters. I didn't want to take them directly from the official page (dangerously at arms with Wikipedia's policies), and I don't have any screenshots handy.
{{Reqscreenshot}} - WrexSoul 05:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- There are at least two screenshots found at this site which you may be able to work in.---- (十八) 06:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Subtitle format
I have changed "One ~Kagayaku Kisetsu e~" to "One: Kagayaku Kisetsu e" for the same reasons I have stated at Planetarian: Chiisana Hoshi no Yume. The use of tildes for subtitles is not standard English and anyone who really gives a damn about the exact spelling of the original title can still see it in the nihongo templates.--SeizureDog 08:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GAN
I have nominated this article for Good Article status.--十八 07:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Passed GA
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
Congrats the article passed GA. Any questions will to my talk page. -- (Cocoaguy ここがいい contribstalk) 01:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Unofficial translation
I am going to remove the notice about the unofficial patch since it is in violation of Wikipedia's copyrights, specifically where it states:
- However, if you know that an external Web site is carrying a work in violation of the creator's copyright, do not link to that copy of the work. Knowingly and intentionally directing others to a site that violates copyright has been considered a form of contributory infringement in the United States (Intellectual Reserve v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry). Linking to a page that illegally distributes someone else's work sheds a bad light on Wikipedia and its editors. The copyright status of Internet archives in the United States is unclear, however. It is currently acceptable to link to Internet archives such as the Wayback Machine. - WP:C#Linking to copyrighted works
The patch was developed and released without permission from Tactics or Nexton, and thus cannot be displaying on Wikipedia on this basis.--十八 10:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Remove it.--SeizureDog 20:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- While linking to it may be against Wikipedia policies, would mentioning the translation itself with no link be acceptable? --|Quickdart 19 November 2007 —Preceding comment was added at 12:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- I would be against it on the basis that if a note about the trasnlation exists, someone (at some time) will try to add in the link to the trasnlator's website, and that means we'd have to revert it every time it came up. Even if we wrote in a hidden note to not include it, I'm sure it would still happen. Furthermore, the fact that an official translation exists is notable, but the fact that an unofficial one exists means we'd inadvertantly be pointing people towards said translation if they wanted to find it, and thus be involved with contributory infringement.--十八 19:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- While linking to it may be against Wikipedia policies, would mentioning the translation itself with no link be acceptable? --|Quickdart 19 November 2007 —Preceding comment was added at 12:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)