User talk:On Wheezier Plot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Bryan Berg article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Yanksox (talk) 06:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Smallville

If you continue to revert the trivia section on Smallville (tv series) you will be report for violation of the 3 revert rule. That information is unencyclopedic, it doesn't pertain to this article, and where it does it is already mention on the respective pages. Please stop adding it. You are adding more "Superman" trivia that "Smallville" trivia. This is your last warning. Bignole 18:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks

Do not make personal attacks or be otherwise rude to other editors. Such behavior will earn you a block. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 19:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Lefty, please spare a thought or two for a while by reading my post in your user talk page. Moreover, please consider carefully of what I am trying to express over there on my post so that you will able to understand what I have been felt through during those "stressful" and "depressed" time of mine! Secondly,

"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you." ---Saint Matthew, chapter VII, verses One and Two (New International Version).

Thank you. -onWheeZierPLot Saturday, 22nd July, 2006ad.

[edit] Removing warnings from your Talk Page

Please do not remove warnings left by other editors on your talk page. This is considered vandalism. I have restored the warning from Mr. Lefty above. Thanks, Gwernol 03:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Zeldamaster3 12:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

I still do not believe this! Why my talk pages are only and mostly filled with admonishments, strict warnings, and stern cautions without any pleasant sense of ease and comfort with no "light and easy"! When will this "slightly negative and moderately pessimistic" tone of this matter going to be over or to end? WHY??? "SSSOOOOOBBBBB.......!!!!!!!"
HUH!!??? Dear Zeldamaster3, I am totally and completely BAFFLED and was ASTONISHED by what you are editing your warning statement in here after I have done reading it! My bottom-line question is: What damage or vandalism have I done to deserve this? I do not get what you are trying to mean and mentioned it here. Is this some kind of a joke? Do you mean or are you referring about the vandalism back from what I have done into this page i.e. in my own user talk page here? As far as I can remember and if I am right, the only vandalism I know lucidly so far which I really did it in Wikipedia accidentally was the one that happened in my own talk page here and nothing else! In addition, however, that incident was happened way back virtually a month ago (that is, 29 days ago to be exact)! Why only you issue such notification at this time and not earlier back then? Gwernol has cautioned me already almost the same thing like what you have mentioned it previously from your message. Henceforth, I have understand that it is not good for me to erase those posts in this page in which I consider them as derogatory for me to read and I did not do that anymore. If it is not that aforementioned matter which you are indicating about, then what is it? Are you really one of the administrators from this Wikipedia? Plus based from your notice above, what do you mean that I did unconstructive edits? On what and on which Wiki-article did I do such a thing? Please explain it to me honestly, reasonably, clearly, and intricately with strong proof/evidence about my "wrong action" so or in order that I can realise comprehensively about the whole situation and learn from my lesson of my own mistakes. Thank you. --onWheeZierPLot 06:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry!

That was not me! My sister was doing her vandalism search. She is User:1234321. I have wikipedia set to log me in automatically! SHE is the one who made this mistake. So . . . Sorry!

The REAL --Zeldamaster3 11:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. --onWheeZierPLot 20:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your message at my talk page

Greetings On Whezzier Plot.

Thanks for your message. When I first encountered you, I hoped that you were simply a new contributor, unfortunately I had dealt with a lot of vandalism a short time before we met. This experience combined the start of our conversation was rather unfortunate :)

Life is a short and precious thing, and holding grudges is one of the worst ways of wasting the time God has given us. I certainly don't hold any grudges against you. May I suggest that we both clear the slate and start afresh like we had never met before? If you will allow me to give you a small friendly piece of advice; try not to use bold or italic text when you write your messages (or use it more sparingly). Many people read highlighted text as very close to yelling, and this was how I read your message the first time. I am very glad to see that this was not your intended meaning. I hope you'll have a pleasant time on Wikipedia and I wish you a lot of good edits :) If you're ever in doubt on something, you are most welcome to write me and I'll try to help. Happy editing and best regards. Valentinian (talk) 08:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. --onWheeZierPLot 21:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Disambiguation pages

I've noticed from your work on Twin Towers and elsewhere that you've been quite enthusiastic about contributing to wikipedia's disambiguation pages, however I'd like you to keep in mind that disambig pages are primarily a navigational tool, and adding excessive links to them can be distracting and confusing. The style guide recommends only to link the terms which are possible meanings of the term being disambiguated, so as to allow for easy navigation. Any user who wishes to find out more about a topic can do so on that topic's own page. You might want to read WP:DISAMBIG and WP:CONTEXT if you haven't already. Enjoy your time at wikipedia, and happy editing. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 07:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit summaries at Saddleback Church

It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigate edit wars. - Glen 08:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

I have replied into your talk page. --onWheeZierPLot 10:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
On Wheezier Plot, though I certainly do appreciate the effort you put into your work I would like to remind you that your edit summaries are and were completely unnacceptable. I will cite you some examples from the last few hours of today alone:
“ Contie, if you're not a very good article writer, kindly please DON'T remove the shortcuts! This is considered VANDALISM!!! There is no lame excuse on why it shouldn't be there. Thank you

Beginning to bring back all the section edits that has been vandalise by Wikipediatrix. Please stop this VANDALISM! Kindly please consider improving rather than damaging the work of others.

 ”
Now telling someone they are "not a very good article writer" is not only uncivil it is a personal attack - and I have looked at both the other editors contributions and they did not constitute vandalism in any way shape or form, they were good faith edits. Just because the editors do not share your point of view does not give you the right to hurl personal attacks at them. I noted before warning you that you have been warned about this before. I find it ironic that you feel I need to be more encouraging towards you, when all I did was apply the template {{civil2}}.
So, rather than attacking me (or my edits) once again perhaps you could take it on board that an administrator actually made the effort to take the time to come speak to you about your actions, and maybe there's a lesson to learn from that. Thank you for taking the time to think about this - Glen 10:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
I've also come here to warn you about the edit on the Deceased Wikipedians page; this is a personal attack, not to mention that that edit's nothing close to vandalism. Please watch your tone in future conversations. Ral315 (talk) 23:21, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What are you smoking?

Seriously, are you taking medication of some kind? Why all the bold words and metre-long, overreacting, unnecessary, responses? --84.64.51.100 22:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Huh? What do you mean by what am I smoking? In actual fact, I do not smoke (cigarettes) in real life! (Evidence can be found from my userpage's userboxes under the subheadline of "My Profession, Status and Situation". Didn't you go there and have a look, glance, or noticed it?) You bet that I am taking some kind of a medication then all-right! Well, the truth is that I was truly a Wiki-newcomer in those early days of being a Wikipedian myself, and still unknown to so many other new stuffs which are yet to be discovered unexpectedly from this encyclopedia. Besides, I was also a bit hectic as well for that heated affair back then!
Nevertheless, those erred incidents that happened (are solely regretted and thus they) were just a passing fad (to/for me) and it was really not my intended meaning to emit out such overreacting messages/responses back from that House of cards' discussion page. Moreover, Valentinian and I already had reconciled and had bury the hatchet over such disputes by resolving each other's differences for quite a long time ago. For more good reasons about why I was doing in such a aggravated manner, they can be found in/from what I have already "written" into his (i.e. Valentinian) talk page here plus of what he had replied it to me subsequently into my talk page from above regarding that particular dissension which we had during those unfortunate times.
On the other hand, of what I really find it odd and unusual about your talk post here is this: I could not believe that you are delivering your message here only right now around at this time of the hour of the few recent days and not back then whilst/when such of my obsolete-cum-unwanted matters which had occurred long before for almost more than three-and-a-half months ago! Why so late or delay by telling me this and not back then? "Sigh!" Last but not least, please try not to edit anonymously! While there seems to be nothing wrong with this, the lack of sincerity and responsibility can be obviously perceivable/noticeable by other registered Wiki-users of this Wikipedia. Do try to sign-in, log-in, or register yourself the next time you want to edit anything here or elsewhere in this big Wiki-website in order to become an existent Wikipedian member so that others can get you recognised easily and also to know you even more and even better! Thank you. --onWheeZierPLot 19:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm an anonymous editor, and there's nothing you can do about it. As for the rest of your response... I think the evidence speaks for itself.--84.64.51.100 23:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Alright then, suit yourself! :| --onWheeZierPLot 23:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Language in edit summaries

Please use English in your edit summaries on the English wikipedia. Edit summaries such as [1] and [2] are not much use for other editors. Chovain 01:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikilogos

I've noticed you are a graphic designer, you might be interested in my proposal for Wikipedia use logo variations created by members of the wiki community to mark national and international awareness days, Remembrance Days, notable anniversaries, and observance days. Please comment on Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Logo Variations and on my talk page. Thanks! FrummerThanThou 05:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. --onWheeZierPLot 15:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Disambig page format

Hi OWP,

I just cleaned up the disambig page MSC, in keeping with the guidelines of MoS:DAB. You had formatted it previously (last September 30th), but I just wanted to mention that article titles on disambig pages should not be written in bold, except in the introduction line. Also, there should be no period (or any punctuation) at the end of each line, and only one link per line (for example "Meritorious Service Cross, a Canadian decoration of post-nominal letters" and not "Meritorious Service Cross, a Canadian decoration of post-nominal letters"). I dare say you might have figured this out since then, but in any case I recommend that you take a look at MoS:DAB when you format disambig pages, if you haven't already done so. Have a great day, IronChris | (talk) 17:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from Wikipedia due to repeated disruption of articles. You have been warned numerous times. I am sorry this could not work out for you. —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 23:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Dear Messed Rocker, Starting from around this year 2007AD ever since I have been absent for many days or very seldom arriving into this encyclopedia and during that entire period up until today I honestly have never come across to do any act of vandalism onto any wikipage. What sort of hecking repeated disruptions are you stating about? Who do you think you are apart from using your powers by blocking me like an ambush unexpectedly? Now that does not sound very nice and polite of you in regards of what a sensible or a decent Wiki-administrator would normally or correctly deal about it and you seem not to take things observantly or carefully of the whole clear picture thoroughly as far as my case is concern. Therefore, I guess it is time for me to return back to my real home once as it should be by believing plus confirming that this means or signals the end of my Wikipedian life here for I will have no other choices and affiliations to turn to but have decided to quit and shun myself from editing any of my purported plus incomplete work in any articles at all which I have involved before in contributing them.

“Thanks, a lot!” >:-( Now I have realise and have found out how an awkward life would be like for a Wikipedian living in such conditions like me truly is after I went through several and occasional trials and tribulations by running through the nine-months gauntlet here explaining myself for my alleged “disruptive” actions so that or in order that I can inform others concerning how “pleasant” and horrendous it is to edit Wikipedia’s articles who would thought that this popular encyclopedia is the ideal online site for them to become an online editors-cum-encyclopedists so easily! Maybe my new niche in the Malay Wiktionary as a new Wiki-lexicographer would be better off the only suitable-cum-ultimate Wiki-place for me to be "born again". In addition, not to mention that these below would be my final words in Wikipedia as a bottomline to you all:

Wikipedia will not suck if it is was not for all the overriding or outweighing of exaggerated and superfluously created Wikirules, Wikilaws, or even some unstable Wikiguidelines as well as block threats that were produced, engraved, or made up in general into this so-called “FREE” online encyclopedia.

FINE!!! I AM RESIGNING AND LEAVING WIKIPEDIA FROM NOW HENCEFORTH!!! >:-( I KNEW THAT THIS BLOCK WOULD HAVE HAPPEN TO ME ONE DAY EVENTUALLY AND THAT IS IT, FOR THERE IS DEFINITELY NO POINT HAVING ME TO REQUEST FOR UNBLOCK BECAUSE SOONER OR LATER SOMEONE ELSE MIGHT CROP OUT OF THE BLUE TO COME AND BLOCK ME AGAIN!!! MOREOVER NO POINT FOR ME ALSO TO GO TO WP:AMA AND CONSULT SOME OF THE WIKI-PSYCHIATRISTS OVER THERE TO “CURE AND CLEANSE MY SUFFERINGS” ANY LONGER FOR I AM REALLY AND UTTERLY DISGUSTED, FED-UP AND TOTALLY FRUSTRATED WITH SOME OF THESE RELENTLESS MISUNDERSTANDINGS DETRIMENTALLY OF EVERYONE WHO POSTED THEIR RESPECTIVE ADMONISHMENTS INTO THIS TALKING PAGE SINCE SEVERAL OF YOU ALL GUYS WOULD NOT WANT TO COOPERATE WITH ME ON WHAT I AM DOING AND THIS UNWANTED NEGATIVE NATURE OF YOURS HAS BEEN BOMBARDING, INPOSING, OR INFLICTING AGAINST ME FROM TIME TO TIME, ON AND ON, AGAIN AND AGAIN CONTINUOUSLY EVER SINCE RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING WHEN I WAS A NEWBIE, THEN IT WOULD BE COMPLETELY USELESS AND FUTILE INDEED TO CALLED THIS A SO-CALLED “COLLABORATIVE” WIKISITE!!!!! THUS, I AM ALSO VERY SAD AND DISSAPPOINTED ABOUT THIS UNTOWARD MATTER AFTER EXPERIENCING DISSENSIONS AFTER DISSENSIONS UNTIL THIS BLOCK COMES IN AS YOUR LAST “RESORT”! HOW MUCH MORE DO I HAVE TO GO ON FURTHER AND ENDURE OR BEAR WITH THIS KIND OF ENVIRONMENT??? NO MORE REPLIES AND RESPONSES FROM ANYONE ELSE ANYMORE OWING TO WHICH I HAD FULLY ENOUGH OF YOU ALL THAT ALMOST GETS ME ON MY STRESSFUL NERVES AND THAT IS THE END OF STORY!!! Never will I see Bignole for his egoistic attitude, nor will I see Mr Lefty for his judgmentality, Gwernol for her intransigent nature, Glen S for his intolerant character nor even with his ally Ral 315 for his hardnose behaviour! NEVER!!! I HAVE PROMISED TO MYSELF NEVER AGAIN WILL I COME INTO THIS WIKISITE FOREVERMORE! DOGMATIC WIKIPEDIA GO AND GET LOST!!! >:-( --onWheeZierPLot 20:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


RESIGNED AND BOYCOTTED WIKIPEDIA.

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia. Please do not reply to this distressed user for he or she will not return here to read anymore further messages forever into this site. Thank you.

[edit] Unblocked

Sorry, but I was misled when I made the decision to block you. Please make us proud. —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 23:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Samuel Doctorian

An editor has nominated Samuel Doctorian, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Doctorian and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Editing other people's comments

Hi. Per [3], please do not edit comments made by other users. Thanks. One 11:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)