Talk:On the Waterfront
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. (January 2007) |
Contents |
[edit] Summary
Needs a section summarizing the plot
- Someone needs to expand on Terry's "trechery". I believe he was already against the mob by the time his brother was killed. MC Dupree 16:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Miller Connection
The article states that Miller's crucible is a response to "On the Waterfront". The play was written in 1953 and the movie was made in 54. Is it the other way around ? - Vatsa, June 9, 2005
- Perhaps the article is talking about A View From The Bridge Aioth 03:28, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Factual inaccuracies
There are two significant unsubstantiated and unsourced statements in this article. The first is the "Crucible" issue above. That is contradicted by the description of the origins of the movie on filmsite.org, which I have linked.
The second is the reference to a Hoboken informant named Arthur DiVincenzo being the basis of this movie. I could find no reference to DiVincenzo on Google, except for pickups of this article. He is also not mentioned in the book "Waterfront Priest" in either the index or in the introduction by screenwriter Budd Schulberg.
note* articles can be found regarding di vincenzo's case against columbia & his settlement. ref: the jersey journal archieves about mid 1970's & current archieves of the hoboken reporter as seen in Hoboken History Issue No. 18, published by the Hoboken Historical Museum. article author Nicholas Acocella editor of the respected insider newsletter New Jersey Politfax. *other - columbia pictures, out of court lawsuits & settlements 1970's. *an awarded 25 thousand to di vincenzo proving a obvious negation of schulbergs denial of anthony di vincenzo's claims.
According to Schulberg, the book was based on the Malcolm Johnson stories and his discussions with Father Corridan. So I am going to remove the references to the Crucible and to DiVincenzo unless someone can produce some verifiable sourcing of that.--Mantanmoreland 17:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:On the waterfront423.jpg
Image:On the waterfront423.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)