User talk:Omishark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Omishark, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Cheers, TewfikTalk 14:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Re:Thanks

No problem . If you ever have any questions, feel free to ask me. Hope you enjoy editing here, TewfikTalk 15:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm not 100% sure of policy on this issue, but I can tell you that what I have observed done, and what I have done, is to try to find sources, but still edit in their absence. Sources are generally more important for controversial claims, though if you plan on including more than just a mainstream critique of the institution, you may want to either wait for sources (perhaps a student newspaper?), or not include them at all. Generally, a lack of sources can indicate that a "mainstream" claim may not be mainstream at all. You may also want to address your query to Wikipedia:Help desk. Hope I was helpful, TewfikTalk 16:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Northern Ireland mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee.It doesn't list you as a party, but you may wish to add yourself.Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Northern Ireland and, if you wish, add you name and indicate that you agree to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Bandarban District

It's easy to remove text - click on the "edit this page" tab, select the part you want to delete, press backspace or delete, click on the "save page" button... presto. But, it's not so easy to rewrite stuff, right? You knew what information was a right, and still decided to delete instead of correcting it. Please, in cases like this, if you don't care to improve the article by applying some writing and stuff, consider an easier option - do nothing. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 03:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC) - please, respond to my talk page

Thanks for understanding. I'll be available if you need help with anything about Wikipedia. Aditya Kabir 06:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Vera Röhm

A tag has been placed on Vera Röhm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —BradV 15:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)