User talk:Omegace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Some cookies to welcome you! :D
Some cookies to welcome you! :D

Welcome To Wikipedia! Hello, Omegace, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay and make constructive edits. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and have a great time being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, I will always be willing to help or you can ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 19:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] G.I. Joe on Anime Central

I noticed you changed the link on the AnimeCentral article to point to G.I. Joe: Sigma 6. Unfortunately, despite rumours on the Anime Central Forums, it is actually the older G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero series that is being shown. Please stop changing it. Astronaut (talk) 17:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I was not sure if that is airing or not? I thought it was sigma 6. I thought that the other one would air on pop. --Omegace (talk) 20:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

[edit] March 13

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Team Rocket (anime) has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. MelicansMatkin (talk) 22:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brookfields School Article.

I am planning to make an article based on Brookfields Special School in Reading, Berkshire. I need to know is it worth making it and it's Ofsted number. Anyone from wikiproject schools, berkshire and england to answer these questions. --Omegace (talk) 10:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding the removal of Flaunt+1 and Bliss+1 test labels from various Wiki pages

Could you please answer one question for me? Why the hell do you keep removing the information about Flaunt+1 and Bliss+1 for? Me and other users including Skyisthebest have posted that information as its true. Now, I can understand you removing it from the testing section when they didn't have any video and/or audio tests and just had the EPG data, as that can change, however, full tests of Flaunt+1 have begun eariler today on 11.643V under the label of "52370" and Bliss+1 will also start within the next few days, also on the same transponder under the label of "52375". It's not as though we are posting total rubbish and cock-and-ball stories like some users have done i.e. Thames Televison, CSC Media being bought out by Universal etc etc. I look forward to reading your reply. Skytvfreak 23:00, 2nd May 2008 (UTC)

I won't remove it any more and i thought you and sky is the best were telling stories like GMTV Chart Show saying CSC Media Group getting brought out by NBC Universal. --Omegace (talk) 09:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for replying. Basically me and Skyisthebest are regular posters on the Sky Testing threads, on Digital Spy. We usually post new information about new test labels, which inturn become new channels as well as current ones rebranding. Unlike people like GMTV Chartshow, we don't post rubbish however, sometimes we may get the odd be wrong, for example when Kix was announced, the source where the information was from got the name wrong, but the principle was there. If, you currently haven't seen our Digital Spy threads, they are a good read and even though I don't know everything about some of the very technical stuff, I do learn a lot from them. This weeks thread is this one>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=787783.Skytvfreak 12:55, 3rd May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

[edit] May 11

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Tiny Pop has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. --AJFurnell (talk) 14:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sega Newsletter