From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Greece, an attempt to expand, improve and standardize the content and structure of articles related to Greece. |
If you would like to participate, you can improve Olympic Stadium (Athens), or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ. |
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (comments) |
Mid |
This article has been rated as a Mid priority article |
Additional information: |
|
|
|
This article is supported by the Athens task force. |
|
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:
- Referencing and citation: not checked
- Coverage and accuracy: not checked
- Structure: not checked
- Grammar: not checked
- Supporting materials: not checked
|
|
|
Olympic Stadium (Athens) is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
High |
This article is on a subject of high priority within inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. |
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
Olympics To-do:
- Add full results for events of the:
- Articles need improvements:
|
[edit] Roof Controversy
Well, although the way the article phrases that the roof of the stadium was controversial was such that I interpreted it incorrectly, there is in fact a source for the controversy claim (well, probably several sources). I located this one: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-93959285.html, so I'm putting it in the references. Unfortunately, I cannot verify if the article indeed originated in the Washington Post.
I also think that the word "controversial" might be unnecessary altogether, though I will not remove it. It seems to refer to something that is presently moot. Perhaps an entire section on the roof controversy might make it warranted, however - from the abundance of news coverage that shouldn't be hard to do. 67.163.165.236 (talk) 11:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)