Talk:Olympic Committee of Portugal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Olympic Committee of Portugal is part of WikiProject Portugal, a project to improve all Portugal-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Portugal-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance for this Project's importance scale.

Olympic Committee of Portugal is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article is on a subject of Mid priority within inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Peer review Olympic Committee of Portugal has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
Olympic Committee of Portugal was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Reviewed version: February 20, 2007

[edit] Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 20, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: The article would have passed this criteria, prose was engaging and made me want to know more, if it hadn't been for half of the article being in list formats. The lists need to be converted to prose.
2. Factually accurate?: Sources seemed to support assertions
3. Broad in coverage?: Failed this criteria. Almost nothing about their actual activities, what was there was in a list titled objects
4. Neutral point of view?: There were questionable assertions that were really just POV masquerading as fact.

Example: Despite political pressure and government funding cuts, the COP set up a public fundraising campaign and, with the IOC's support, managed to send a symbolic delegation to the boycotted Moscow Games, thus displaying a strong loyalty to the Olympic values. That's a major assertion. It implies there was nothing political at all behind the decision just the commitment to the Olympic values, which I doubt is true.

5. Article stability? Looks stable yes, no overt vandalism that I could see
6. Images?: Failed. No images aside from a logo, which doesn't add a lot.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far. --A mcmurray 19:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)