User talk:Olive Garden Guild

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on Olive Garden Guild, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Olive Garden Guild is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Olive Garden Guild. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable.--Fuhghettaboutit 02:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

This is a rising group which will soon have it's own website and more members. We currently have 13 but everyday we invite more and more people to join it. I will update the page if it is not deleted, I just dont want to have to make another one. Thank you, and I hope you consider keeping it!

Contents

[edit] Geek (Disambiguation)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --omtay38 04:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page April 17 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Fabricationary 05:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] War Veteran

I have reverted the material you added to the above article and wanted to explain why it isn't appropriate. Though the name of the article is "War Veteran," it is not about war veterans in general but about a specific science fiction story. For that reason, only material about that story itself is on topic. In fact, even in an article that was about war veterans in general, a note about the number of war veterans running for office, as appearing on the Colbert Report, would be quite a random factoid. A few other notes: signing you posts is something you only do on talk pages. You should never do so upon adding material to an article proper. New text material should be placed somewhere in the main part of the article, so be careful that you post above the stub tag, and other templates that appear at the end of the article. It is also a good idea to leave an edit summary when you post material. Thanks for your understanding and happy editing.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:15, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Barry Manilow

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Barry Manilow. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.

[edit] Regarding edits made during August 29, 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Luna Santin 03:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during August 29, 2006 (UTC) to Barry Manilow

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Ryūlóng 03:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No Personal Attacks

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. Ryūlóng 03:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your final warning. If you continue to vandalize pages on Wikipedia, make inappropriate edits or personal attacks, including inappropriate or offensive edit summaries, or continue to cause problems in other ways, you will be blocked from editing indefinitely.
This is your SECOND final warning. If you continue to vandalize pages on Wikipedia, make inappropriate edits or personal attacks, including inappropriate or offensive edit summaries, or continue to cause problems in other ways, you will be blocked from editing indefinitely.
This is your THIRD final warning. If you continue to vandalize pages on Wikipedia, make inappropriate edits or personal attacks, including inappropriate or offensive edit summaries, or continue to cause problems in other ways, you will be blocked from editing indefinitely.
This is your FINAL final warning. If you continue to vandalize pages on Wikipedia, make inappropriate edits or personal attacks, including inappropriate or offensive edit summaries, or continue to cause problems in other ways, you will be blocked from editing indefinitely.

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by vandalizing. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Yanksox 03:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I have been hacked"

Decline reason: "Unlikely story, especially considering that the last vandal edits were not all that long ago. No particularily postitive edits can be found. ---- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.