User talk:Oli Filth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please note: if you post here, I will post my replies here, unless explicitly asked otherwise.


Archive
Archives
1, 2, 3, 4


Contents


[edit] Assistance?

Hello Oli. You always seem to have a good insight in data transmission. I am involved in a few discussions where perhaps you can assist. If and when you have time. I don't want to publish anything before I get response from at least one person.

  • Can the OFDM article further emphasize that OFDM is a modulation scheme, but is based on FDM plus inverse multiplexing? (See the discussion.)
  • Can the Nyquist rate article and related articles be rewritten to reflect to what extent it is valid for baseband and passband channels? I made a suggestion but it was completely deleted by someone. See the talk page.
  • A similar question for the Shannon–Hartley theorem. However, here I am not sure if the theorem valid is for the passband case, and why. I teach in this area, and it is a problem for me that I have not found a good intuitive explanation to this topic.

Mange01 (talk) 21:21, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Sure thing. I will add my comments to these in the near future. Oli Filth(talk) 21:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Apple on GSM page

I re-did the edit on the GSM page removing Apple. The guy who did it originally did it in good faith and started a discussion point on the GSM page to explain why. I pretty much agree with him. But if you dont can you explain why, maybe I'll agree with you too  :) I'm sure we can agree on a way forward through discussion and explanation of our views rather than simply spend the rest of our lives editing backwards and forwards. The GSM discussion page is probably the place for this Beardybloke (talk) 22:28, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nofootnotes on Hilbert transform

I removed the template you added to Hilbert transform, since that article uses Harvard references, and there are quite a few scattered throughout the text. Although I think there should be more citations, it is not the case that there are no citations. I'm not sure if you were aware of this when adding the template, so I thought I should notify you here. Regards, siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

You're absolutely right; I didn't notice the Harvard style! Thanks for letting me know. Oli Filth(talk) 12:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)