Talk:Olgivanna Lloyd Wright

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 8 February 2008. The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator.

You've got to be kidding me. I have just started this article, and I am working on editing it. It is based on a few lines taken from another website, yes; does that make it copyright infringement?? Hardly. I am still working on this article and it deserves to be heard. It's just awfully hard to finish editing when it seems like the "wikipedia community" is opposed to its general creation.. it is important to not let the "negative aspect" of "speedy article deletion" overcome genuine consideration of this article's (and it's subjects) general worth and interest to society. Sometimes, important nuggets of information that may have been over-looked by the general public will be of continued interest to scholars, espcially when it comes to TITANS like Frank Lloyd Wright and Gurdjieff.

This article obviously has merit and should not be deleted. Instead, it should be ideally edited (and improved upon) by the same people calling for its deletion. Mr manilow (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] my own quotes

I just discovered that my web own page is cited and quoted in this article, a thing that I did not initiate. I stand behind the facts on my page, but I've changed my own description (I'm not a "Taliesin insider") and removed a block quote I just don't think is appropriate in tone for wikipedia (Olgivanna as "stone hottie"). --Lockley (talk) 06:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)