From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Norway, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Norway. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
|
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a WikiProject related to the nation of Iceland. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
| Stub |
This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project’s quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
[edit] Gamli sáttmáli
It has long been agreed that the treaty of 1262 should be called Gissurarsáttmáli and that the treaty of 1302 is the proper Gamli sáttmáli. The accuracy of the sagas has also long been questioned, although there are many kinds of sagas, and Íslendinga saga can readily be accepted as a contemporary source. So, what has Patricia Pires Boulhosa to offer in the way of new insights? Everything in this article has long been known. Are we dealing with a doctorate student here, or with a scholar who has strayed outside her field? Cheers Io 19:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- My shame, my shame. I should have read the first paragraph. Editing accordingly. Cheers Io 19:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
