Old Sarum (UK Parliament constituency)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Old Sarum Borough constituency |
|
---|---|
Created: | 1295 |
Abolished: | 1832 |
Type: | House of Commons |
Members: | two |
Old Sarum was the most infamous of the so-called 'rotten boroughs', a UK parliament constituency which was effectively controlled by a single person, until it was abolished under the Reform Act 1832. The constituency was the site of what had been the original settlement of Salisbury, which was known as Old Sarum. The population had moved to nearby New Sarum (now usually called Salisbury) centuries before the abolition of the parliamentary borough.
Contents |
[edit] Boundaries
This was a Parliamentary borough in the historic county of Wiltshire. It is located on a hill about two miles north of the modern city of Salisbury.
[edit] History
Old Sarum was unlike other rotten boroughs in that it never had a substantial population. It was invited to send two members to the House of Commons from the reign of Edward II due to the presence of the Bishopric of Old Sarum, but shortly after, the site of the Bishopric was moved to New Sarum together with most of the population. A small hamlet, located alongside the Roman road to the south of the hill fort, remained but with steadily declining population as the houses became uninhabitable.
The borough was organised on a Burgage franchise where the inhabitants of designated houses had the right to vote. From at least the 17th century it had no resident voters, but the overall landowner retained the right to nominate tenants for each of the burgages who were not required to live there. For a long time, the borough was owned by the Pitt family and used as their pocket borough (one of the members in the 18th century was William Pitt the Elder). In 1802, the head of the family, Lord Camelford sold the borough to the Earl of Caledon, who owned it until its abolition; the price was reportedly £60,000, even though the land and manorial rights were worth £700 a year at most, an indication of the value of a pair of parliamentary seats. At its last election in 1831, there were eleven voters, all of whom were landowners who lived elsewhere. This made Old Sarum the most notorious of the rotten boroughs. The Reform Act 1832 completely disenfranchised Old Sarum.
Elections in Old Sarum were conducted on a mobile hustings under a specific tree which was located in what was known as the 'Electing acre'. In the last years, the spectacle of the election was enticing enough to draw a small crowd who observed the ritual presentation of the two candidates and the call for any further nominations.
Stooks Smith quotes a contemporary description of the 1802 election.
This election for the borough of Old Sarum was held in a temporary booth erected in a cornfield, under a tree which marked the former boundary of the old town, not a vestige of which has been standing in the memory of man, the several burgages which give the right of voting, being now without a dwelling for a human being. Mr Dean, the bailiff of the borough having read the precept for the election, and caused proclamation thereof, read the bribery act, and gone through all the legal ceremonies, the Rev. Dr Skinner rose and nominated Nicholas Vansittart, and Henry Alexander, Esq. from a thorough conviction that their public conduct would be such as would give satisfaction and do honour to their constituents. The other electors acquiescing in this nomination and no other candidates offering, the proclamation was thrice made for any gentleman disposed to do so, to come forward, the bailiff declared the above two gentlemen to be duly elected. There were five electors present at this election, (beside the bailiff of the borough who lives at Wimborne,) viz., the Rev. Dr. Skinner, of the Close; the Rev. Mr. Burrough, of Abbot's Ann; William Dyke, Esq., of Syrencot; Mr. Massey and Mr. Brunsdon, both occupiers of land within the limits of the borough. The above account is thus particularly given to rectify several prevalent mistakes relative to this celebrated borough, and to show that the election is conducted in a manner every way consonant to the law of the land and the constitution of Parliament.- (History of the General Election of 1802, page, 149.)
[edit] Members of Parliament
[edit] 1295-1640
- 1604-1611: William Ravenscroft
- 1604-1611: Edward Leache
- 1621-1622: George Mynn
- 1621-1622: Thomas Brett
- 1624-1625: Sir Robert Cotton
- 1625: Sir John Stradling
- 1626: Sir Benjamin Rudyerd
[edit] 1640-1832
Year | First member | First party | Second member | Second party | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
November 1640 | Hon. Robert Cecil | Parliamentarian | Edward Herbert | Royalist | ||
1641 | Sir William Savile | Royalist | ||||
September 1642 | Savile disabled from sitting - seat vacant | |||||
1646 | Roger Kirkham | |||||
1647 | Sir Richard Lucy | |||||
December 1648 | Cecil not recorded as sitting after Pride's Purge | |||||
1653 | Old Sarum was unrepresented in the Barebones Parliament and the First and Second Parliaments of the Protectorate | |||||
January 1659 | Richard Hill | William Ludlow | ||||
May 1659 | Old Sarum was not represented in the restored Rump | |||||
April 1660 | Seymour Bowman | John Norden | ||||
1661 | Edward Nicholas | John Denham | ||||
1669 | Sir Eliab Harvey | |||||
February 1679 | Eliab Harvey | John Young | ||||
August 1679 | The Lord Coleraine | Sir Eliab Harvey | ||||
1681 | Sir Thomas Mompesson | |||||
January 1689 | John Young | Thomas Pitt | ||||
March 1689 | William Harvey | John Hawles | ||||
1690 | Sir Thomas Mompesson | |||||
1695 | Thomas Pitt | |||||
1698 | Charles Mompesson | |||||
1705 | Robert Pitt | |||||
1708 | William Harvey | |||||
1710 | Thomas Pitt | William Harvey | ||||
1713 | Robert Pitt | |||||
1716 | Sir William Strickland, Bt | Whig | ||||
March 1722 | Thomas Pitt | |||||
November 1722 | George Morton Pitt | |||||
1724 | John Pitt | |||||
1726 | George Pitt | |||||
1727 | Thomas Pitt of Boconnoc [1] | The Earl of Londonderry | ||||
March 1728 | Matthew St Quintin | |||||
May 1728 | Thomas Harrison | |||||
1734 | Thomas Pitt of Boconnoc [2] | Robert Nedham | ||||
1735 | William Pitt | |||||
1741 | George Lyttelton [3] | |||||
1742 | James Grenville | |||||
May 1747 | Edward Willes | |||||
July 1747 | Thomas Pitt of Boconnoc [4] | Sir William Irby, Bt | ||||
December 1747 | Earl of Middlesex [5] | The Viscount Doneraile | ||||
January 1751 | Paul Jodrell | |||||
November 1751 | Simon Fanshawe | |||||
1754 | Viscount Pulteney | Thomas Pitt of Boconnoc | ||||
1755 | Sir William Calvert | |||||
March 1761 | Thomas Pitt of Boconnoc | Howell Gwynne | ||||
December 1761 | Thomas Pitt (the younger) | |||||
1768 | William Gerard Hamilton | John Crauford | ||||
1774 | Pinckney Wilkinson | Thomas Pitt (the younger) | ||||
January 1784 | John Villiers | |||||
March 1784 | George Hardinge | |||||
1790 | John Sullivan | |||||
1796 | The Earl of Mornington | |||||
1797 | Charles Watkin Williams-Wynn | |||||
1799 | Sir George Yonge | |||||
1801 | Rev. John Horne Tooke | Radical | ||||
1802 | Nicholas Vansittart | Tory | Henry Alexander | Tory | ||
1806 | The Lord Blayney | |||||
1807 | Josias du Pre Porcher | Tory | ||||
1812 | James Alexander | Tory | ||||
1818 | Arthur Johnston Crawford | Tory | ||||
1820 | Josias du Pre Alexander | Tory | ||||
1828 | Stratford Canning | Tory | ||||
1830 | Josias du Pre Alexander | Tory |
Notes
- ^ Pitt was also elected for Okehampton, which he chose to represent, and did not sit for Old Sarum
- ^ Pitt was also elected for Okehampton, which he chose to represent, and did not sit for Old Sarum
- ^ Lyttelton was also elected for Okehampton, which he chose to represent, and did not sit for Old Sarum
- ^ Pitt was also elected for Okehampton, which he chose to represent, and did not sit for Old Sarum
- ^ Middlesex was also elected for Bodmin, which he chose to represent, and did not sit for Old Sarum
[edit] Elections
Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
The last contested election in Old Sarum was at the general election of 1715. Thomas Pitt and Robert Pitt defeated Richard Jones and Charles Tucker. The number of votes cast for each candidate appears not to have been recorded.
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- Rayment, Leigh (2003) Leigh Rayment's Peerage Page [Online], Available at http://www.angeltowns.com/town/peerage, Accessed 22nd April 2007
- D Brunton & D H Pennington, Members of the Long Parliament (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954)
- Cobbett's Parliamentary history of England, from the Norman Conquest in 1066 to the year 1803 (London: Thomas Hansard, 1808) [1]
- Smith, Henry Stooks (1844-1850) The Parliaments of England from 1715 to 1847, in 3 Volumes, London: Simpkin & Marshall, republished Craig, F.W.S. (ed.) (1973), Chichester : Political Reference Publications, ISBN 0-900178-13-2