User talk:Olaf750

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Superstars

I take it you mean this reversion. The only other removal of the material was by yourself. Are there any others because I couldn't find any? I looked back through the articles I deleted, the last 1000 to 27 November 2006, but don't see that I deleted any article related to the book. If you can point out any others it would be helpful. My suggestion is that you find some sources to indicate why the book is notable and create a seperate article for it. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes I think it was that, but I've found a way to fix it by creating a new article. Thank you for your answer. Olaf750

Thanks for your message. Definition of notability of books is here. This book seems to be bit of a borderline case, movie not being released yet (the fact that there is no English translation does not mean anything). References and links to even non-English pages would help a lot. Keep up the good work. - Skysmith 13:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome - Skysmith 18:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Commercial use of Image:Annscott2.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Annscott2.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Annscott2.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Annscott2.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I have changed with replacing appropriate licence. Thank you. Olaf750

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flammarion Superstars.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Flammarion Superstars.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)