User talk:OJHomer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] That Zarbon Image

Why don't you just put it on the Zarbon page rather than the action figure page, or keep both the soccer figure and Zarbon figure in the same article? How does that sound?--SUIT^-n-tie 06:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Action figure. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Power level (Dragon Ball) 06:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Fine then we'll have both on there. User:OJHomer

I never called you that[1]. Don't be a dick is technically a rule, and you were breaking it. It's the same as being dense. Power level (Dragon Ball) 07:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Also, there's no need for two images on Action figure. Leave Ryan Giggs there, he is a much more popular collectible than some toy named Zarbon. Remember that you don't OWN the article, though I'm sure you're familiar with that policy since you 'somehow' already knew about sockpuppets and even 3rr even though you were just created moments before edit warring on the article... Power level (Dragon Ball) 07:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Help

Hi I'm new here on Wikipedia and not too sure how to report someone who broke the 3RR rule as User:SUIT did on the page Action figure and he is possibly a sock or meat puppet of User:Power level (Dragon Ball) He called me a dick and linked it to a page so he wouldn't get in trouble. Any help appreciated. User:OJHomer

I already explained it on User talk:23skidoo. I ain't gonna say it again.--SUIT^-n-tie 08:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

It does seem very odd that such a new user would know about sockpuppets and the three-revert rule but it is not totally unheard of. The 3RR exists to prevent the reinstatement of material that is deemed to be non-encyclopedic or vandalism in nature no more than three times in any 24-hour period. Reversion of this inclusion of material does not break the 3RR. The proper procedure is to initiate a discussion about the worth of the material on the article Talk page and for consensus to be achieved. Name-calling and protesting/reporting does not display a good Wikipedia editing attitude and neither to the edit summary comments that OJHomer has left either. Before you take this to WP:AN/I or other noticeboard, I suggest that you re-read the 3RR guidelines and also read WP:CIVIL too. If you are a new editor then you would do well to read the help pages and the guides to contributing effectively to Wikipedia. Regards, (aeropagitica) 08:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)