Oil megaprojects

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Oil megaprojects are large oil field projects to bring a significant amount of new oil production capacity to market. Tabulations of oil megaprojects are used in an attempt to forecast whether future global oil supply will be adequate to meet demand for oil, or whether the world is reaching Peak Oil. As such, oil megaproject analysis has been controversial. This approach to oil forecasting is also known as the "bottom-up" approach, in that it relies on building a detailed model of where and when new oil production capacity will come on line.

In a series of studies reported in the media, the energy consultancy Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA) argued, beginning in May 2005, that oil production capacity would increase by as much as 16 million barrels per day (2,500,000 m³/d) between 2004 and 2010 - almost a 20% increase. [1] They suggested this might lead to an excess of supply over demand by as much as 7,500,000 barrels per day (1,192,000 m³/d), which could lower oil prices, perhaps below $40 per barrel.[2]. In a July 2005 Op-Ed in the Washington Post, CERA President Daniel Yergin asserted that, based on the "large, unprecedented buildup of oil supply in the next few years", that "the growing production capacity will take the air out of the fear of imminent shortage."[3] Again in mid 2006, CERA concluded based on an analysis of 360 projects that global oil production capacity might increase to 110 million barrels per day (17,000,000 m³/d) by 2015.[4]

In contrast, a series of project tabulations and analyses by Chris Skrebowski, editor of Petroleum Review, have presented a more pessimistic picture of future oil supply. In a 2004 report[5], based on an analysis of new projects over 100 thousand barrels/day (kbd), he argued that although ample supply might be available in the near-term, after 2007 "the volumes of new production for this period are well below likely requirements." By 2006,[6] although "the outlook for future supply appears somewhat brighter than even six months ago", nonetheless, if "all the factors reducing new capacity come into play, markets will remain tight and prices high. Only if new capacity flows into the system rather more rapidly than of late, will there be any chance of rebuilding spare capacity and softening prices."

Several issues, explained at greater length in this article, account for the differences. Firstly, to the extent lists of projects are incomplete, erroneous conclusions may be drawn. Secondly, real world considerations such as project delays may cause inaccurate inferences from projects. Finally, in addition to tabulating new capacity, researchers and analysts must also model the decline of existing capacity, and differing assumptions about such decline will lead to differing conclusions. In addition to an overview of these issues, this article includes a detailed tabulation of projects (maintained by the Wikipedia Oil Megaprojects task force) which readers may use to draw their own conclusions about future oil supply.

Contents

[edit] Application to oil supply forecasting

The basic idea of Megaproject based forecasting is simple: the analyst totals up the capacity of all the new projects coming on in a given year, and uses this total to assess whether oil supply will be adequate. However, a number of factors complicate this simple picture. Firstly, and most importantly, the existing production capacity will change for various reasons even before the addition of the new capacity. The most significant reason for this is declines - the tendency of oil wells to gradually produce less oil over time as the field suffers from Oil depletion and water (typically) intrudes into the field. However, other factors are important too: some oil production capacity may be spare (deliberately unused), and variations in the amount of spare capacity can cause production to change without any new capacity being added to the market. Furthermore, accidents, natural disasters, wars, and revolutions can affect production of oil in various regions of the world.

Additionally, projections of new capacity in the future are subject to uncertainty. Large oil production projects are very complex and massive engineering projects often carried out in difficult places - in very deep water, in remote parts of the world, in very cold or very hot areas, or in areas subject to political or bureaucratic barriers to business activity. As such, they frequently get delayed past the intended date, or even cancelled. Even when projects are not cancelled, it is still typical that a new project does not reach full capacity on the first day after it comes on stream. Typically, a project reaches first oil when it first delivers any production to the market, then ramps up over a period of months or years until it reaches plateau at the capacity of the facilities to process oil. It stays on plateau for years to decades, and then begins a period of decline, before eventually being closed down permanently when it is no longer economic to produce the tiny available oil supply. Megaprojects are generally tabulated by when they reach first oil, but it is important to bear in mind that because of ramp-up, full production will not be reached for some time.

Any oil supply forecast based on megaproject capacity must, explicitly or implicitly, model these factors in order to translate capacity into production.

Number of oil fields discovered per decades grouped by average flow rates (left) and corresponding oil volumes (right) in giga-barrels (Gb). Data taken from the annexe B of "Twilight in the Desert" by Matthew Simmons.
Number of oil fields discovered per decades grouped by average flow rates (left) and corresponding oil volumes (right) in giga-barrels (Gb). Data taken from the annexe B of "Twilight in the Desert" by Matthew Simmons[7].

The idea of tabulating the largest projects (Megaprojects) was historically justified because the observed oilfield size distribution is well described by a Parabolic fractal distribution[8], and thus the smallest fields do not contribute a large fraction of the total. For example, a relatively small number of giant and super-giant oilfields are providing almost half of the world production[7]. Therefore, it is generally convenient to gather information only on a few large projects and then model the depletion from the rest of the resource base composed of small oilfields. As time has gone on, however, Megaproject lists have tended to include smaller and smaller projects.

[edit] Decline rates

Main article: Oil depletion

The most important variable is the average decline rate for Fields in Production (FIP) which is difficult to assess[citation needed].[9][10][11]


[edit] Introduction to the project tabulations

This article is accompanied by a series of tabulations of oil supply first coming on stream in each year from 2003 to 2020. These have been compiled by an exhaustive search of oil company annual reports and press releases. It's important to understand the methodology used in creating these tables, or in the summary graphs and tables presented in the present article. These include.

Significant is defined here as capable of producing at least 40,000 barrels of oil per day. This list of megaprojects completes this list of oil fields from the past and present. Maintaining an updated list of future oil projects is key to the forecasting of future oil supply, and assessing the date and seriousness of peak oil.

The detailed tables for each year can be accessed through these links, and are summarized below.

Overview 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

[edit] Existing databases

[12][13][14][15][16][17][18]

[edit] Oil megaproject summary

[edit] Repartition per Country

New gross supply additions from Megaprojects.
New gross supply additions from Megaprojects.
Percentage of new supply additions (2003-2018) per country. The "Others" category includes countries with less than 1% contribution.
Percentage of new supply additions (2003-2018) per country. The "Others" category includes countries with less than 1% contribution.
Liquid additions by category coming from oil megaprojects: NGL= Natural Gas Liquids, unconventional= Bitumen, synthetic oil from tar sands, GTL, etc.. Projects with no specified category were added to the crude oil/condensate group.
Liquid additions by category coming from oil megaprojects: NGL= Natural Gas Liquids, unconventional= Bitumen, synthetic oil from tar sands, GTL, etc.. Projects with no specified category were added to the crude oil/condensate group.

Volumes shown are in thousand barrels per day.

Country 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Total 3172 2747 3776 3855 3314 6912 6146 3770 4563 5111 1237 680 672 30 162 130 50
OPEC
Total OPEC 957 1770 1175 1815 1050 2828 4176 1759 2565 2090 275 240
Algeria 70 80 50 121 100 150
Angola 90 250 325 425 430 250 130 335 795 125 140
Indonesia 40 200 20 50 165 30 80
Ecuador 52 30
Iran 95 85 190 150 320 375 35 260 255 210 100
Iraq 50 860 340 300 440
Kuwait 65 300 60 60 50 25 160
Libya 115 150 10 250
Nigeria 195 225 390 570 40 254 260 400 150
Qatar 70 45 130 180 220 645 40 130 135
Saudi Arabia 300 690 300 1108 1645 950
UAE 90 290 135 350 60 155
Venezuela 180 70 75 380
Non-OPEC
Total Non-OPEC 2215 977 2601 2040 2264 4084 1970 2011 1998 3021 962 440 672 30 162 130 50
Australia 40 200 85 100 115 120 126 100
Azerbaijan 325 750 260 200
Brazil 70 250 300 340 648 515 215 230 780 710 100
Cameroon 35
Canada 255 90 266 605 130 660 282 820 132 190 247 30 162 130 50
Chad 225 60
China 62 100 165 100 100 500
Congo 90 40
East Timor 25
Egypt 40
Eq. Guinea 110 60
Gabon 40 15
Ghana 150 20
India 50 175 25
Italy 50
Ivory Coast 65
Kazakhstan 150 250 285 160 120 300 260 750
Malaysia 105 120 60 100 40
Mauritania 75
Mexico 730 503 173 51 74
New Zealand 40 35
Norway 389 176 45 120 170 70 220 85 132
Oman 60 140
Papua New Guinea 40
Peru 50
Philippines 15 10
Russia 380 250 766 40 330 290 165
South Africa 30
Sudan 250 285
Syria 30
Thailand 40 12
Trinidad 60
UK 40 30 60 305 45 175
USA 279 282 210 105 200 420 335 80 160 120 150 200
Vietnam 70 90 100 105 20
Yemen 25 30 30

[edit] Notes

[edit] External links


[edit] References

  1. ^ "LIQUIDS CAPACITY SET TO CONTINUE EXPANSION TO 2010 AND BEYOND". 
  2. ^ "Capitalism's Amazing Resilience, Rich Karlgaard, Forbes, 11/1/04". 
  3. ^ "It's Not the End Of the Oil Age, Washington Post, 7/31/05". 
  4. ^ "Expansion Set to Continue: Global Liquids Capacity to 2015". 
  5. ^ "Oil field mega projects 2004". 
  6. ^ "Prices holding steady, despite massive planned capacity additions". 
  7. ^ a b Simmons, Matthew (2005). Twilight in the Desert. Wiley, 448. ISBN 978-0-471-73876-3. 
  8. ^ Laherrère J.H. 2000: " Distribution of field sizes in a Petroleum System: lognormal, parabolic fractal or stretched exponential?" Marine and Petroleum Geology 17/4, April, p539-546
  9. ^ Lawrence Eagles (2006). Medium Term Oil Market Report. OECD/International Transport Forum Roundtable.
  10. ^ John Gerdes (2007). Modest Non-OPEC Supply Growth Underpins $60+ Oil Price. SunTrust Robinson Humphrey.
  11. ^ PETER M. JACKSON (2007). Finding the Critical Numbers: What Are the Real Decline Rates for Global Oil Production?. CERA.
  12. ^ Skrebowski, Chris (2007-02). "New capacity fails to boost 2006 production" (PDF). Petroleum Review. 
  13. ^ Skrebowski, Chris (2006-04). "Prices holding steady, despite massive planned capacity additions" (PDF). Petroleum Review. 
  14. ^ "Industry Projects" (viewed December 5, 2007). Offshore Technology. 
  15. ^ "Field Development Projects" (viewed December 5, 2007). RIGZONE. 
  16. ^ Gerdes, John (September 25, 2006). "Energy Insight" (PDF). SunTrust Robinson Humphrey (Gerdes Group). 
  17. ^ Gerdes, John (February 6, 2007). "Energy Insight" (PDF). SunTrust Robinson Humphrey (Gerdes Group). 
  18. ^ "Oil Supply Analysis 2006-2007" (PDF) (October 2006). ASPO Netherlands Newsletter #5. 

[edit] See also