User talk:Of
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Of, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Contents |
[edit] Hello, Zscout370
Instead of replying to my email, feel free to leave a message here. O (talk) 11:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tambayan pages
Hey ! Don't do that.--Jondel 14:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
The edit was made to archive the discussions on that particular topic. O
- I see now, hopefully Jondel did as well. --Kukini 04:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please do not move pages
Please do not move pages unless you have discussed your intentions on the talk page. Moving a page is a drastic step and especially for a featured article, the move was highly inappropriate. Thank you. Argyrios 06:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Also, note that there is a process for reaching consensus on article moves that are likely to be disputed: Wikipedia:Requested moves. Melchoir 06:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
The edit has been reverted. O
- Come on, DON'T MOVE THE PAGE WITHOUT DISCUSSION haven't you read what other users said to you, on 2006? Please... --Howard the Duck 02:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Refer to the article's discussion page. O
You haven't learned, have you? Now all of these anons are cut and pasting the bloody article, the GFDL history will be screwed up. For controversial moves, can't you just say hello to the talk page? You do always do things unilaterally, if this happens again, I'd report you to WP:AN and recommend a block. --Howard the Duck 04:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- It is encouraged that you post a notice to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct if you believe I've been exhibiting persistent improper behavior despite several warnings from editors. O (talk) 03:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hey at least I ask for permission unless the article name is really silly. You just go ahead and do your stuff. --Howard the Duck 05:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Refer to Talk:Philippine coup attempt of 2007 for further discussion. O (talk) 07:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hey at least I ask for permission unless the article name is really silly. You just go ahead and do your stuff. --Howard the Duck 05:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Can you even just add a summary on why you moved it? Just that so we'd know why. --Howard the Duck 07:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- The moved article namespace has settled and I've provided explanations on its talk page. For your convenience, I've focused my wikitime on being involved with the Typo Department and irrelevant content deletion. Happy trails! O (talk) 11:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User talk page etiquette
Regarding user talk pages, it is best to not delete notices, but instead, to archive them. You will find how to do this here [1], under "When pages get too long." Actively erasing non-harassing personal messages is often interpreted as hostile. In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil. For this reason, if your deletion of notices and concerns on your user talk page is to keep the "clutter" down, I suggest that you instead create archives for these messages. I would be happy to help you do just that if you ask me to. -Kukini 04:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh, hello. Yes, I removed the notices to keep the "clutter" down. At the same time, however, I also do not wish to archive discussions on my talk page. Will keep this one, though. O
- Deleting notices is not the same as archiving them. See [2] for an example of archiving. Please do not delete notices, particularly when they are pointing out blanking or other forms of vandalism. --Kukini 04:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Of... I just wanted to say thanks for reverting the changes made by the asshat vandals on my user page. I appreciate ya, pal. Caknuck 06:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hi!
Do you want to join the Tambayan? I see that your have edits in Philippine based articles so you might be interested in joining us. By the way you should have a userpage so that other users can see what your edit preferences are. --Lenticel (talk) 07:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Quote on Retribution
Hello, why did you delete (twice) the quote on the Retribution article. You left no comment on the history log. Hervegirod (talk) 23:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- I removed your 'notable quote' because I believe it was unencyclopedic. You might want to consider using Wikiquote instead. O (talk) 11:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tagalog Wikipedia
Tagalog Wikipedia is campaigning for your participation in writing, editing, assessing and translating articles!
The purpose of this campaign is to expand and improve articles at Tagalog Wikipedia. Your participation will be highly appreciated by the community.
There are over 16,000 articles to view, read, review, edit, and expand, so please visit the Wikipedia Café and the WikiProject Philippines at Tagalog Wikipedia to help out!
The campaign includes seeking your assistance in:
- Providing requested pages
- Providing requested articles
- Providing articles required for all language Wikipedias
- Starting or improving pages that need translation
Or just anything you can do to help us just like what you are doing there at the English Wikipedia.
Thank you in advance and regards, Tagalog Wikipedia CommunityFinally, Wikipedia is the 7th most visited site in the Philippines. Then why is it that the Tagalog Wikipedia, the Wikipedia in your own language remains unknown to most of the Filipinos? The mission of this campaign is to change that. Will you join us?