User talk:Oe65

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user is a sock puppet of Webapp, and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Oe65 (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "having problems with an abusive sysop Hu12, repeatedly removing my fixes on the article here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_content_management_systems his reason has nothing what ever to do with the content of the fixes or request for cleaning the article."

Decline reason: "You may not create new accounts to circumvent a block, even if you feel the block is unjust. Please log in at your original account, and request an unblock there. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I did not ask to open an account to circumvent a block, this is my account, I have contributed to an an article with several corrections and in return I got banned and blocked by a psychopath sysop, user Hu12. Instead of arguing back on these fixes he is stalking my discussion note, edit/delete them to hide evidence and then he blocks me.


List of abuses by Hu12:

One classic examples out of atleast one dozen others (!): http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&diff=213150399&oldid=213149345

"Abuser, sysop Hu12 is more concern about his/her own reputation then the facts. Now she/he blocks the entire page, removing 1 request for cleaning the page for dozens of CLEAR mistakes, 1 misleading logo/link of "free softwares portals", 6 corrections on fake GPL listed items (3 of them are clear try & buy) all which listed under GPL and "free software portals" logo, 2 dozen others with price ranging from 25-9000 usd also enjoy the self obsession of the abusive sysop. I am forwarding a complaint against this Maniac. Now he/she is desperately busy in "fighting back" her ego issues with conspiracy theories." (deleted/edited by abusive sysop Hu12).


1.) Repeated Editing/deleting of notes on discussion pages to hide his/her abuses.

2.) Repeated bocking of IPS, to prevent me from returning back my relevant notes.

3.) Removal of essential corrections on the article.

4.) Repeated blocking of IP, discussion pages and articles in order to create a confusion and hide my contributions.

5.) Personal actions while being a sysop, he certainly should have given up and ask someone else do the job for him/her.


My mistakes:

I did re register 3 new accounts to return back my fixes, well no one is perfect. But please get this maniac away from me.

i'm contacting the blocking admin. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:48, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia owes much of its success to its openness. However, that very openness sometimes attracts people who seek to exploit the site. Unfortunatly this is just such a case. Nothing much to add that hasn't already been covered here here and here. This spammer has been a disruptive and disputatious presence accross several wikimedia projects. --Hu12 (talk) 03:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Now this psycho (Hu12) is coming with conspiracy theories, can someone remove his flags so he stops abusing his sysop access? My updates were essential, the article we talk abut does require cleaning and it does provide wrong information about those CMS scripts with regards to their licenses. Example: WP can not tell visitors that a CMS is free and under GPL license (in dozens of instances!) while the vendors them self o not even claim so!

Hu12 is another issue that requires the attention of the democratic tools WP has or a real life therapist.