Talk:Odyssey Number Five

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Powderfinger (Rated FA-Class) Powderfinger Portal Odyssey Number Five falls within the scope of the Powderfinger WikiProject, an effort by Wikipedians to improve articles on the band, its songs, albums, and members (as well as their side projects). For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the assessment scale. High This article is on a subject of high priority within the project WikiProject Powderfinger Quick Tasks: edit  Create: "Automatic (Powderfinger song)" Expand: Steven Bishop, Powderfinger's Oi Song Trilogy Bring to GA: Tea & Sympathy, Far Out Corporation, The Predators (band) WikiProject Australia      (Rated FA-Class) Portal Odyssey Number Five is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. FA This article has been rated as FA-class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music. See also P:AUSMUSIC. Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Albums      (Rated FA-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. FA This article has been rated as FA-class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. Alternative music WikiProject     (Rated FA-Class) Alternative music Portal This article is part of the Alternative music WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the Project's quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the Project's importance scale.

	Odyssey Number Five is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do.
	Odyssey Number Five is part of the "Powderfinger discography" series (project page), a featured topic identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 27, 2007 Good article nominee Listed December 28, 2007 Peer review Reviewed January 12, 2008 Featured topic candidate Promoted February 10, 2008 Featured article candidate Not promoted March 10, 2008 Featured article candidate Promoted Current Status: Featured article

Contents 1 Fair use rationale for Image:Powderfinger-LikeADog-13sec.ogg 2 Fair use rationale for Image:Powderfinger-My Happiness-23s.ogg 3 All Music Review 4 Good article review 5 Huh? 6 Remaining items from previous FAC

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Powderfinger-LikeADog-13sec.ogg

Image:Powderfinger-LikeADog-13sec.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Y Done — Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 07:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Powderfinger-My Happiness-23s.ogg

Image:Powderfinger-My Happiness-23s.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Y Done — Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 07:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] All Music Review

I am not quite sure what this sentence means; "He also stated that the album achieve success in the American market." and a look at the source didn't help. Please rewrite the sentence for clarity. Good luck with the GA. Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 09:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Y Done - [1] - thanks for picking this up, Matt. Cheers, — Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 22:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good article review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): See above b (MoS): See above notes.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

Article passes all standards. The user did a very good job. I've been watching his work and personally like it. ^Mitch32^contribs 02:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks! — Dihydrogen Monoxide _(Review) 02:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Huh?

He also stated that the album achieve success in the American market. - erm...what should go here...just a 'd' on 'achieve' ?cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd say so; I've changed it as such. Probably just a typo. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 08:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Classic case of Engrish. --rm 'w avu 09:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

That's unpossible! Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 09:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Remaining items from previous FAC

Hi all - User:Dihydrogen monoxide asked me to post any follow up comments here to my comments at this article last FAC. It appears that a good amount of additional work has gone into the article to address reviewer concerns - great work! The only problem I still have, really, is that the "'Odyssey' song series" heading still links to the Powderfinger's Oi Song Trilogy article, which is unsourced, although the heading no longer discusses it. --Laser brain (talk) 15:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

OK, link removed. Anything else before we go for FAC again? dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 08:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh well, in my impatience (sorry!) I ended up just going for it again. Please leave any comments there (or here if you wish). Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 10:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)