User talk:OceanDepths

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here's my talk page. Comments welcome. OceanDepths 03:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

{unblock} цI wasn't told why I was blocked accept that Iam suppossively a wolfstar sock. OceanDepths 03:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The thing on my userpage says "It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of Thewolfstar. Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log." OceanDepths 03:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not going to unblock you just now, but I am going to take this to WP:RFCU so someone can look into it. Mangojuice^talk 03:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay. thanks Mangojuice. OceanDepths 04:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] the rfcu

I read what is on the page WP:RFCU and the comparison by Tijuana Brass my blocking admin. He says "I was the blocking admin for OceanDepths. She has very similiar contribution patterns to Thewolfstar, namely, focusing on articles relating to Anarchism, Thomas Jefferson (and other early American leaders), and Liberalism. An edit concerning Henry David Thoreau is telling, as Thewolfstar has had a frequent interest in Thoreau quotes. The creation of an uncapitalized user subpage for no apparent purpose is also a sign of a Wolfstar sock."

Why does my blocking admin call me a she? I am a boy, not a girl. I looked into the wolfsar contributions and the wolfstar did not edit any anarchism artilces. I did edit the anarchism article. I can't help it if the wolfstar liked to quote Thoreau. I did never quote Thoreau I put Thoreau and other US anarchists back into the anarchism article. And I cant help it what this wolfstar says on her website.

There was a use for making a subpage. I tried to save my edits and I got a message that said the database cannot save your edits. So I saved them on another page, so I wouldn't have to do the smae work all over again. Look at this please saved edits And here is the subpage that is supposively useless User:OceanDepths/saved edits.

My blocking admin cant be ethical because first he blocked me on some suspicious charge and did not even bother to confer or anything and I am being blocked on the mental twisting of a admin. Then he removed my one post on my user page which was this User:OceanDepths/saved edits. And then he replaced my link and my reason for the extra page with false statements and messages.

Then when the kind and considerate MangoJuice went and did a proper WP:RFCU Tijuna Brass steps in and makes phony claims to stop a checkuser which would show how I am defeintly not the wolfstar.

Can a proper checkuser be run and policy followed so it can be proved that I am not a sockpuppet of a banned user?

Judging by TijuanaBrasses actions this admin has a ruler complex, takes full authority into his own hands and should have his admin powers taken away. OceanDepths 15:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Checkuser has now confirmed that you are a sockpuppet of User:Thewolfstar, so you will not be unblocked. Mangojuice^talk 21:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Umm. well checkuser is either broken or Mackensen is an inept liar. I just got here and am not a sockpuppet. Tijuana Brass and Mackensen should both be fired. They stink at what they do and they both have God {George W Bush} complexes. Wikipedia has shoen itslef once again to be a giant asshole. In case you all havent noticed Wikipedia is getting blasted all ovet the internet for just this nonsense.

Bye dirtbags, incompetent admins and megalomaniacs. Also that comment Tijuna Brass about wolfstar poking around and comming back is extra dumb. You could use that against anyone as they didnt say it she did. Uh duhhh OceanDepths 01:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)