Talk:Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
???

This article is supported by WikiProject Objectivism, which collaborates on articles related to this philosophy. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.

Socrates This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.

"It is considered to be the only systematic presentation of Objectivism that Ayn Rand herself authorized, though it wasn't per se. Rather, it is actually based on a series of lecture courses by Peikoff himself, which Rand approved of. "

The only really problem with this statement is that it ignores the 20-lecture "Basic Principles of Objectivism" series done by Nathaniel Branden, who at the time was Rand's intellectual and legal heir, and was ALSO approved by Rand, etc. etc. Peikoff's work came later, and AFAIK, while Peikoff was Rand's legal heir, he was never her intellectual heir. --Emb021 15:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Articles for Deletion debate

This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 18:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Books by Ayn Rand?

I have removed the category "Books by Ayn Rand," as Leonard Peikoff, not Ayn Rand, wrote the book. LaszloWalrus 21:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Philosophy

I've reverted LGagnon's Aug. 15 edit, which removed all references to Objectivism as a philosophy. Whether or not it's flawed, juvenile, or ideologically motivated, it is a purportedly logically derived system with positions in metaphysics, epistemology, etc. Calling it an "ideology" implies it's something loose and politically based. --zenohockey 02:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)