Talk:O-17 Courier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.	Aviation Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Aircraft WikiProject

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Military aviation task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): Canadian military history task force United States military history task force

[edit] Sourcing

The "Variants" section ought to be explicitly sourced. :-) Kirill 23:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

I have added a reference for US Military variants into the reference paragraph, do we really need a citation for each variant. If you think something wrong then please bring it up on this page. MilborneOne 20:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I explicitly sourced all variants, now when people read this article they will "know" we are anal about citations. --Colputt 22:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

You could have probably gotten away with a single overall citation; but more footnotes generally don't hurt things, in any case. ;-) Kirill 16:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)