User talk:Nutmegger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Future infrastructure

Just a quick word on usage of {{future infrastructure}}: the term "sortkey" is a technical term for where an entry should appear in an alphabetical category listing, like Pennsylvania Station (New York City) is sorted under "New York" in Category:Amtrak stations. It's usually not useful, so you can omit it (the default is the article name). Also, you don't have to add the category Category:Future infrastructure to the page; just adding the template automagically includes the category. Happy editing! --CComMack (t•c) 00:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Clybourn (Metra)

(in reply to [1])

First, check the 'What links here page' from the Clybourn page: [2]. All those pages refer to the plain Clybourn location and will need to be updated to Clybourn (Metra)... that page can be accessed to check the incoming links after the page is moved.

To do the actual move, on the Clybourn page, click the move tab (next to history). Fill out the fields and press the button. -- Loco830/Espio (Rant) 18:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Metra box

I've created a Metra line box template in the style of the CTA line box. I've converted all the Metra station articles I saw to use the template. The code is, using the UPN Davis Street stop as an example:
{{start Metra box}}
{{Metra line|previous=Evanston Main Street|next=Evanston Central Street|line=Union Pacific/North}}
{{end box}}

This produces:
Template has been deprecated and nominated for deletion - removed from page -- Loco830/Espio (Rant) 17:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Omitting the previous or next terms results in Terminus being displayed. The only downside to the current template is that it adds 'Line' to the end of the service name, resulting in, for example 'SouthWest Service Line' being displayed and linked to. For the moment, I've created redirects for the lines without 'Line' at the end.

The templates are at Template:Start Metra box and Template:Metra line - feel free to tinker with them :) -- Loco830/Espio (Rant) 15:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of rail accidents

Excuse me sir, but I strongly disagree with your deletion of the recent railway accidents which happened in The Netherlands of List of rail accidents. Your argument that no one was killed, is to my humble opinion not a qualifier to determine if it was a railway accident or not. The accidents you removed were quite disruptive for the train circulation in the country (both Rotterdam and Arnhem stations were blocked, though you may not be able to read the Dutch on the referenced web pages, you can see the damage at the pictures in the article). It was fortunate no lives were lost, but it was certainly an accident, both caused by flaws in the safety system. Furthermore, you enhanced the India bombing accident. That is not a railway accident (though it happened at a railway, but it could have happened anywhere), it is a terrorist attack. I reverted your deletion, if you want to delete my additions again, I suggest you go through the list and delete everything that did not take lives (and that's quite a few). Sorry if my tone is a bit harsh, but I have put quite a lot of work in that particular edit you have removed. --Brinkie 09:25, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Exposition Park (Los Angeles)

I am confused by your recent edit to Exposition Park (Los Angeles). You added the following category, Category:Parks in Los Angeles, to the article, which as you can see by the redlink, does not exist. The article was already in Category:Landmarks in Los Angeles, which is where all the other LA area parks are categorized (such as Griffith Park).

[And please don't create Category:Parks in Los Angeles—I'm in the middle of reorganizing all the Southern California categories.] ^Blank ^Verse 11:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Manchester, CT

If you don't mind my asking, can you explain why you changed the Hartford County category and replaced it with the new Manchester, CT category? I can understand adding the Manchester category, but it doesn't make sense to me why you removed the Hartford County category from the article. Leebo⁸⁶ 03:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay, well, as long as it's not actually changing anything since the Manchester, CT category is within the Hartford County category as a subcategory. It's a lot of articles, not one in particular really... I just saw a bunch of changes and I didn't know if there was any discussion related to it. Leebo⁸⁶ 03:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Metros in FSU

WP:SOVMETRO you clearly have interest, so please join :). --Kuban Cossack 14:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Russian community?

Does West Hartford really have a large Russian community? There aren't any Russian stores in the Center, are there? Λυδαcιτγ 01:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Interesting; I never realized that. Thanks. Λυδαcιτγ 02:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Cities with the most highrise buildings (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 07:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:JournaldeMontreal.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:JournaldeMontreal.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:MontereyCoHerald.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:MontereyCoHerald.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD review

Article that you have created (Phone Call to Putin) was nominated for deletion.Biophys 04:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MobileRegister2005.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:MobileRegister2005.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dailynorthwestern2007.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dailynorthwestern2007.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Drew Peterson

I removed the "see also" tags for uxorcide and Scott Peterson. By WP:BLP we can't really add the link to uxorcide until he's charged without exposing WP to liability. With Scott Peterson, is there anything that links them besides the last name & the missing wives factor? That needs to be a factor when connecting them. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheAdvocate.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:TheAdvocate.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Phil McGraw

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Phil McGraw. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid or outlet for the rumor mill. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ward3001 (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

"The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth". It doesn't matter how true it might be, if you don't add a source (which you did not) it can be libelous for Wikipedia. You violated more than one Wikipedia policy, including WP:V and WP:BLP. Ward3001 (talk) 17:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Steven Kazmierczak merge

Hello. I noticed that you had previously commented on the merge of the article Steven Kazmierczak into Northern Illinois University shooting. I just thought I would let you know that the discussion has been reopened here here if you wish to provide additional input since the one-week cool down period has expired. Thanks. will381796 (talk) 16:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nikita Mescheriakov

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Nikita Mescheriakov, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Framinghamstation.JPG

Hi Nutmegger!
We thank you for uploading Image:Framinghamstation.JPG, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 19:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AsburyParkPress.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:AsburyParkPress.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)