Talk:Nuts (magazine)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Fact tags 2 Humourless Feminist 3 Inappropriate comments 4 Spanish Version

[edit] Fact tags

I consider slapping fact tags on every factoid as a form of vandalism. Maikel (talk) 09:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree. If some idiot has the time to go about putting these tags everywhere then they also have the time to find sources for the information. I understand that Wikipedia needs sources but it's getting ridiculous - next we'll be wanting a source to say that a person is male or female for biographical articles or. 213.230.130.56 (talk) 23:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Humourless Feminist

This magazine is a dangerous publication. It objectifys women and reduces the role of men to neanderthals. If thinking this makes me a humourless feminist then ok - but as far as I can make out calling someone a 'humourless feminist' is the biggest cop out in the book.

Give me specific arguements if you really feel this magazine is wirth defending. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.118.250.106 (talk) 14:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Inappropriate comments

An encyclopedia is not an appropriate location for `argument`, and the assertions you make ("dangerous", "objectifys" (sic)) have never achieved a consensus amongst feminists and social scientists. Srck (talk) 12:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Spanish Version

When I was in Spain a while back, I saw a Spanish language version. It was the same kind of magazine, but everything was Spanish slanted. I was wondering if anyone knows about this or what it was called. It may have been a version of Zoo or Nuts, I'm not sure which. 81.157.42.84 (talk) 22:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC)