Talk:Number 1's (Mariah Carey album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Number 1's (Mariah Carey album) has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment. | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
[edit] Rollbacks today
Just to explain the rollbacks I performed on this article today: the user I rolled back has a history of harassing other editors, including myself, by doing things such as making piddling, trivial and sometimes inaccurate and contra-guideline and/or policy edits to articles they are watching. Extraordinary Machine 17:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- The album was released in Canada on the same day; check the sources you've listed at your own convenience if you still think it's just a "trivial" edit. Otherwise I'm not particularly interested in your innocent act anymore. Velten 02:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm wondering how many times Velten will follow me or some other editor against whom she has a grudge to an article they are watching, perform edits to said article in some puerile and bad-faith attempt to get back at them, and then vehemently deny any wrongdoing and accuse them of all sorts after they revert. Until she get blocked again?
- The only way to deal with her is to simply revert her; if anyone wants to change the release date or the formatting or whatever, those edits can occur "naturally" and in good-faith, not as a means of irritating other editors to get revenge. Extraordinary Machine 21:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- What "revenge"? I for one had never wanted this "hate" to be maintained; I wish you'd just let the past go already. I'm not here to frustrate you. All I did was change United States to North America for accuracy... Velten 23:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- You've persistently denied harassing editors such as myself in the face of overwhelming evidence and consensus to the contrary; why do you expect to be believed when you say you're not here to "frustrate" me? Extraordinary Machine 19:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, that was a long time ago. As I have said before, I am really not interested in lingering on that; I am just trying to cooperate with other editors, but currently you are the one who does not want to try that. Velten 22:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- You've persistently denied harassing editors such as myself in the face of overwhelming evidence and consensus to the contrary; why do you expect to be believed when you say you're not here to "frustrate" me? Extraordinary Machine 19:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- What "revenge"? I for one had never wanted this "hate" to be maintained; I wish you'd just let the past go already. I'm not here to frustrate you. All I did was change United States to North America for accuracy... Velten 23:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Apostrophe
I can't see this mentioned in the article, but I'm curious... why is there an apostrophe in the album's title? (I don't have a problem with the article's title). The JPStalk to me 07:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
