User talk:Nuklear

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sometimes the sandbox is a good place to work if you are going to be making multiple revisions. Just a helpful suggestion. BierHerr 19:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


Welcome!

Hello Nuklear, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --Bk0 (Talk) 01:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Carfentanil

Hi, Nuklear.

I've moved the comment you added to the main article to its Talk page, below your first comment. You can read my reply there.

Thanks, --Bk0 (Talk) 01:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Bohmefent.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Bohmefent.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:OMF.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:OMF.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:14, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Fluorogesic.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Fluorogesic.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Lednicer.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Lednicer.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:OMF2.png listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:OMF2.png has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – riana_dzasta 12:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, please don't reupload Image:OMF2.png under a restricted license, as it will be speedily deleted again. Consider using the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See WP:COPYREQ for more information. Thanks, – riana_dzasta 13:04, 17 March 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ohmefentanyl, you will be blocked from editing. Jeepday 05:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC) (


[edit] License tagging for Image:TropSynth.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:TropSynth.GIF. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging: warning

Since you did not react to the above messages, be advised that you have 24 hours as of this message to appy correct source information and licence tags to the abovementioned images, as well as to all other images uploaded by you, or they will be speedily deleted and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia for persistent copyright violations. Sandstein 15:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:OMF2.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:OMF2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JulesH 17:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:M82188b5b24662f4448048bjz1.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:M82188b5b24662f4448048bjz1.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peter O. (Talk) 01:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Tail.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tail.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 18:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Also listed for deletion are Image:Ohmefentany1.gif, Image:3-methyl-fentanyl.gif, Image:Fluorotanyl.gif, Image:Fluorogesic.gif, Image:Dipipanone.png. If you can put these on proper pages, go for it. --Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 19:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Phenyltropane article

Please don't remove dispute/cleanup tags from articles, as you did to Phenyltropane, without first addressing/discussing the concerns on the talk page. Thanks! -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 20:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Phenyltropane

This article seems to veer way off course in the background section, where the following text was added:

BZ is a popular nonlethal incapacitating agent among the military, a man-made muscarinic that can be used in armed combat scenarios to wipeout the enemy. It is not harmful enough to secure a fatality, whereas deadly nightshade is more insidious.Epibatidine though, is outright lethal.

Firstly, the article is about phenyltropane, not chemical weapons. None of the above text seems to relate to this article at all. Also the Deadly nightshade article and the Epibatidine article both fail to mention anything about their use as a weapon. Immediately below the above text, the format of the line with the external link is overlinked (see:MoS:L), with internal links to completely non-related articles. It is not apparent how the external link supports any of the contents of this article. If it does indeed support the article, it ought to be used as a reference, by tagging it as such. Jerry 00:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Diphenylmethoxytropine

Please either have that page deleted or complete it. The New Mikemoral 23:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Fencamfamine.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Fencamfamine.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Nocaine.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Nocaine.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:08, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Junkey.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Junkey.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Your edit to Phenylpiperidinol

[edit] Message posted on Thursday, May 10, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Phenylpiperidinol. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.freepatentsonline.com/EP1315493.html in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Phenylpiperidinol with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the iWikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Phenylpiperidinol with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Phenylpiperidinol saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

~Matticus TC 08:07, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Ohmefentanyl

Please stop adding nonsense, WP:POV and WP:OR to the article. You fail to use the article talk page and edit summary and continuously add and remove content with no explanation... some of which is looks like vandalism and total nonsense such as "The number of patients successfully euthanized during clinical evaluations was very encouraging". The statement could have very specific scientific explanation but since the article is nothing more than a list of statements, the reader has no idea what the relevance is to the rest of the article. -- I already forgot  talk  19:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

This is a reply to your edit to my user page: "Please stop sabbotaging my OMf page." The ohmefentanyl page is not your personal page. You have made many contributions to the article but you have also made it completely unencylcopedic now. You have indicated that you try to test wikipedia boundaries and it looks like you are now testing the boundaries again...please stop. I also ask that you only leave comments on my talk page. Thanks.-- I already forgot  talk  20:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Your edit to Ohmefentanyl

[edit] Message posted on Monday, May 14, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Ohmefentanyl. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://64.233.179.104/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:JdH1XQ5KqeoJ:www.shd.org.yu/HtDocs/SHD/Vol69/No11/V69-No11-02.pdf , http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/292/3/1127?ck=nck , http://www.chinaphar.com/1671-4083/24/1253.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ohmefentanyl with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Ohmefentanyl with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Ohmefentanyl saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

 I already forgot  talk  06:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Your edit to Fenmodeling

[edit] Message posted on Monday, May 14, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Fenmodeling. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.doiserbia.nbs.bg.ac.yu/img/doi/0352-5139/2004/0352-51390411843D.pdf in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Fenmodeling with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Fenmodeling with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Fenmodeling saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

 I already forgot  talk  07:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Summary Request

I have noted that you edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini hablame aqui 18:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Images nominated for deletion

I have nominated some of the images you have uploaded for deletion, because of doubts about their copyright status and since they are currently unused (only used in a deleted article). Please have a look at images for deletion for more details, and feel free to comment if you don't weant them to be deleted. Regards, Mike Rosoft 11:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Article style

Hi Nuklear,

like you, I am interested in the pharmacology of psychoactive compounds. I have noticed that you have put much effort and time into articles like phenidate, peridine, nocaine, phenyltropane, ohmefentanyl, 2Design. Most of these articles are essentially scientific review articles that summarize in-depth experimental data. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and therefore has a very different style, please see the guideline at Wikipedia:Guide_to_writing_better_articles. Essentially, we put high emphasize on crosslinking articles, we summarize from secondary sources (we do not write them ourselves), and we avoid extremely specific details which only a dedicated few care about (please see Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information).

In their current form these articles are not really suited for Wikipedia and need heavy editing to become encyclopedic articles. Please help in these changes and do not be offended by such edits. Pleae try to get a feeling for the Wikipedia style by reading the Wikipedia guidelines and other existing articles (I know that this takes a while from my own experience). Feel free to respond on this page. Cacycle 20:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I have also commented on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SNDRI. Have you ever thought about starting or continuing a scientific career in pharmacology or medicinal chemistry? There are labs that do exactly what you are interested in - you are actually citing their work all the time! You would have so such much better resources inside academia compared to a small company or as an isolated person. It would also be the only position from where you could submit real scientific publications :-) You should move these articles to your website, they will not survive in their current form - not because they are bad, only because this is not the right place for this format. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need Wikipedia advice. Cacycle 00:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Not meaning to offend

I had no intentions of impugning your work, because obviously a massive amount went into these articles. Well over my head. The articles were nominated because they go well beyond the scope of what Wikipedia is intended for. The way I see it, Wikipedia is more a public library level project, and the articles as you wrote them are on the level of a university research library. I commented regarding copyvio, not because of any suggestions of plagiarism or other nefarious doings, but because at first glance, and article of such scope would most likely be hosted at another web site somewhere, and licensing issues can be tricky to sort out, even if the work is all your own. I've asked in the AfD for someone to clarify that question. In brief, they're not 'bad' articles, they're 'too much' articles. I do not work in the chemistry field, but hopefully another editor with the right resources can find these articles a more fitting home. DarkAudit 03:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hey there

I am a pharma chemist. I think people are saying the style of the articles doesn't match the style of similar articles. One thing you can do is get a Google account and add them to Google Base and Google Pages. You can rewrite the articles in the Wikipedia style and link to your full articles. Don't get discouraged. There is always a place on the Internet for information and the more places it appears the better. It takes a while to be able write in the Wikipedia house style. Write me if you want to chat more. I am surprised you don't want to publish the articles in a journal and add them to your resume. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 04:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:HIANKYO.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:HIANKYO.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Strangepicture.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Strangepicture.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SNDRI

Per the close at this AfD, I have moved several articles into your userspace. They can stay there as long as you wish and you may use them for whatever purpose you desire. I greatly appreciate your efforts and am very sorry if you feel poorly used. Looking at these articles, they do seem awfully technical for a general encyclopedia. In my opinion they would probably be an ornament to Wikibooks], and would encourage you to transfer them if you still want to deal with us. Herostratus 17:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

The new locations of the articles are:

[edit] Image:2b3b.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2b3b.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. isilanes (talk|contribs) 17:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Articles moved to userpage

Hey mate, glad to see the moderators have moved your pages to your userpage, now you can improve them to your hearts content without having to worry about some dumbass vandalising them! I restored ohmefentanyl to the most recent version on your userpage, when I have some free time from uni I'll rewrite your public wiki pages in a more encyclopedic style that they won't keep on deleting... Meodipt 12:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Can you </noinclude> the categories on them so they don't show up in the encyclopedic categories? Thanks. - Che Nuevara 22:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Articles not suited for Wikipedia

Hi Nuklear,

I have seen that you have spend much time recently on working on pages in your user namespace, including User:Nuklear/SNDRI, User:Nuklear/Phenyltropane, and User:Nuklear#Drug_Discovery.

As pointed out to you months ago, these articles are not suited for Wikipedia. They follow the style of scientific review articles, but not the quite different Wikipedia:Manual of Style. As far as I can see, they do (and will never) evolve into Wikipedia articles.

It is explicitly stated on Wikipedia:User page and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, social networking, or memorial site that Wikipedia user pages are not meant as free webspace, for file storage, or as personal advertisement. Your editing should be done on your local computer or your own wiki installation.

I would like to hear about your intention of working on these articles. Currently, I tend to mark them for deletion according to the Wikipedia:Deletion_policy as you did not change your behaviour over the last months.

Сасусlе 15:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cones.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cones.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BigrTex 00:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Skanky.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:Skanky.GIF. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BigrTex 02:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC)