Talk:Nuclear Overhauser effect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Nuclear Overhauser effect is part of WikiProject Spectroscopy, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to spectroscopy. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Comments Please leave a short summary to explain the ratings and to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Er, don't you think this should be linked to more information on NOESY and TOCSY? I think this should not be merged with the article mentioned. Cos I wanted to learn about NOESY and TOCSY, at least Nuclear Overhauser Effect artcle is around, I didn't miss the boat. Just my two cents worth.

Shushinla 10:34, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

I agree with the previous comment. These two topics should not be merged, and it would be ideal if this NOE stub was expanded. Unfortunately, I am not expert enough on the topic to contribute.

I don't think this article should be merged because nOe is significant enough of an effect and is special enough that it should have its own treatment and article.


-I 3rd the motion.


-I 4th