Nuclear disarmament

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

U.S. and USSR/Russian nuclear weapons stockpiles, 1945-2006
U.S. and USSR/Russian nuclear weapons stockpiles, 1945-2006

Nuclear disarmament is the proposed dismantling of nuclear weapons, particularly those of the United States and Russia (formerly the Soviet Union) that are targeted on each other.

Proponents of nuclear disarmament say that it would lessen the probability of nuclear war occurring, especially accidentally. Critics of nuclear disarmament say that it would undermine deterrence, which has kept the world free of nuclear war so far.

Contents

[edit] History

The movement for disarmament has varied from nation to nation over times.

A few prominent proponents of disarmament argued in the earliest days of the Cold War that the creation of an international watchdog organization could be used to enforce a ban against the creation of nuclear weapons. This initial movement largely failed. During the 1960s, a much stronger popular movement against nuclear weapons developed, rallying primarily around the fear of nuclear fallout from nuclear testing.

After the Partial Test Ban Treaty (1963), which prohibited atmospheric testing, the movement against nuclear weapons somewhat subsided in the 1970s (and was replaced in part by a movement against nuclear power). In the 1980s, a popular movement for nuclear disarmament again gained strength in the light of the weapons build-up and rhetoric of President Ronald Reagan. After the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s, however, the momentum would again fade.

In the USSR, voices against nuclear weapons were few and far between as there was no "public" to speak of as a political factor. Certain citizens who had become prominent enough to safely criticize the Soviet government, such as Andrei Sakharov, did speak out against nuclear weapons to little effect.

When the extreme danger intrinsic to nuclear war and the possession of nuclear weapons became apparent to all sides during the Cold War, a series of disarmament and nonproliferation treaties were agreed upon between the United States, the Soviet Union, and several other states throughout the world. Many of these treaties involved years of negotiations, and resulted in important steps toward creating a nuclear weapons free world.

Key Treaties

  • Partial Test Ban Treaty (PTBT) - 1963: Prohibited all testing of nuclear weapons except underground.
  • Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) - signed 1968, into force 1970: An international treaty (currently with 189 member states) to limit the spread of nuclear weapons. The treaty has three main pillars: nonproliferation, disarmament, and the right to peacefully use nuclear technology.
  • Interim Agreement on Offensive Arms (SALT I) - 1972: The Soviet Union and the United States agreed to a freeze in the number of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) that they would deploy.
  • Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM) - 1972: The United States and Soviet Union could deploy ABM interceptors at two sites, each with up to 100 ground-based launchers for ABM interceptor missiles. In a 1974 Protocol, the US and Soviet Union agreed to only deploy an ABM system to one site.
  • Strategic Arms Limitation Treat (SALT II) - 1979: Replacing SALT I, SALT II limited both the Soviet Union and the United States to an equal number of ICBM launchers, SLBM launchers, and heavy bombers. Also placed limits on Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicles (MIRVS).
  • Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) - 1987: Created a global ban on short- and long-range nuclear weapons systems, as well as an intrusive verification regime.
  • Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) - signed 1991, ratified 1994: Limited long-range nuclear forces in the United States and the newly independent states of the former Soviet Union to 6,000 attributed warheads on 1,600 ballistic missiles and bombers.
  • Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty II (START II) - signed 1993, never put into force: START II was a bilateral agreement between the U.S. and Russia which attempted to commit each side to deploy no more than 3,000 to 3,500 warheads by December 2007 and also included a prohibition against deploying multiple independent reentry vehicles (MIRVs) on intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs)
  • Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty (SORT or Moscow Treaty) - signed 2002, into force 2003: A very loose treaty that is often criticized by arms control advocates for its ambiguity and lack of depth, Russia and the United States agreed to reduce their "strategic nuclear warheads" (a term that remain undefined in the treaty) to between 1,700 and 2,200 by 2012.
  • Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) - signed 1996, not yet in force: The CTBT is an international treaty (currently with 177 state signatures) that bans all nuclear explosions in all environments. While the treaty is not in force, Russia has not tested a nuclear weapons since 1990 and the United States has not since 1992.[1]

Only one country has been known to ever dismantle their nuclear arsenal completely—the apartheid government of South Africa apparently developed half a dozen crude fission weapons during the 1980s, but they were dismantled in the early 1990s. Ukraine also relinquished nuclear weapons which had been based there by the Soviet Union upon the latter's breakup.

[edit] NATO's European theatre

After the fall of the Soviet Union, a number of former Soviet republics (Belarus, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan) found themselves in possession of Soviet nuclear weapons, but they were repatriated to Russia (who took responsibility and ownership of the Soviet arsenal) in exchange for negative security assurances and financial compensation from the United States and the Russian Federation. As part of an effort to reduce nuclear tensions between US and Russia after the end of the Cold War, a Russian delegation from the Russian Ministry of Defence led by US-Russian national Alexander M. Dokychuk during their official visit to US in 1992 have stated in a live televised program that Russian nuclear missiles will never again be pointed at US cities.

[edit] Organizations

Many organizations and networks exist which distribute information and put pressure on governments, e.g. the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), which advocated a policy of unilateral nuclear disarmament in the United Kingdom together with the Labour Left, leading it to become Labour Party policy in 1960-61 and again in 1980-89. There was also a strong peace camp movement. Public opinion however accepted the need for a nuclear deterrent, especially since the Cold War was not yet over, and this policy is believed to have been a major cause of Labour's defeat in the 1983 election.

In 1955, 11 leading scientists and intellectuals signed the Russell-Einstein Manifesto, warning of the dangers posed by nuclear weapons and calling on world leaders to find peaceful solutions to international tensions. This was followed in 1957 by the first of the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs.

The 1985 Nobel peace prize-winning International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) advocates abolition of all nuclear weapons. In 2006, it initiated the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.

The Council for a Livable World, founded by nuclear physicist Leo Szilard, and its sister organization, the Center for Arms Control and Non Proliferation, have both advocated for a reduction in global nuclear stockpiles and for an increase in non proliferation efforts.[2]

[edit] US Nuclear Policy

 The neutrality of this article is disputed.
Please see the discussion on the talk page.(June 2008)
Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved.

Despite a general trend toward disarmament in the early 1990s, the George W. Bush administration has repeatedly pushed to fund policies that would allegedly make nuclear weapons more usable in the post-Cold War environment[citation needed]. To date Congress has refused to fund many of these policies. However, some[who?] feel that even considering such programs harms the credibility of the United States as a nonproliferation[clarify] proponent.

Recent Controversial US Nuclear Policies

  • Reliable Replacement Warhead Program (RRW): seeks to build a new generation of nuclear weapons; not funded by Congress
  • Complex 2030: an upgrade to the entire nuclear weapons complex to support the production and maintenance of the new generation of nuclear weapons to be produced under RRW; not funded by Congress
  • Nuclear Bunker Buster Program: a nuclear weapon designed to penetrate into soil and rock to destroy underground targets, allegedly lowering the threashold of use for this type of nuclear weapon; not funded by Congress, and proposal withdrawn.
  • National Missile Defense: a program that seeks to build a network of interceptor missiles that would protect the United States and its allies from incoming projectiles
  • US-India Nuclear Deal: if realized, this agreement would allow India access to US nuclear fuel despite its possession of nuclear weapons outside the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty

The tenets of a "sound" US Nuclear Policy

  • Secure and eliminate fissile materials and nuclear weapons at home and abroad
  • Mutual disarmament based on international agreements with the aim of eventually eliminating nuclear weapons in the world, as stipulated by the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty
  • Leadership without double-standards[3]

[edit] US Policy Options for Nuclear Terrorism

To prevent nuclear terrorism it is essential that nuclear materials are secured, so that terrorist organizations will not have access to the raw materials or already-built warheads.

The United States has taken the lead in ensuring that nuclear materials globally are properly safeguarded. A popular program that has received bipartisan support for over a decade is the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program (CTR). While this program has been deemed a success, its funding levels need to be increased so as to ensure that all dangerous nuclear materials are secured in the most expeditious manner possible. The CTR program has led to several other innovative and important nonproliferation programs that need to continue to be a budget priority in order to ensure that nuclear weapons do not spread to hostile actors.

Key Programs

  • Cooperative Threat Reduction Program (CTR): The highly successful CTR program provides funding to help Russia secure materials that might be used in nuclear or chemical weapons as well as dismantle weapons of mass destruction and their associated infrastructure in Russia.
  • Global Threat Reduction Initiative (GTRI): Expanding on the success of the CTR, the GTRI will expand nuclear weapons and material securing and dismantlement activities to states outside of the former Soviet Union.

[edit] Other States

While the vast majority of states have adhered to the stipulations of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, a few states have either refused to sign the treaty or have pursued nuclear weapons programs while not being members of the treaty. The United States and many other countries view the pursuit of nuclear weapons by these states as a threat to nonproliferation and world peace, and therefore seek policies to discourage the spread of nuclear weapons to these, states, which are often described by them "rogue states".

Three known nuclear powers outside NPT

  • Indian Nuclear Weapons - 70-120 active warheads
  • Pakistani Nuclear Weapons - 30-80 active warheads
  • North Korean Nuclear Weapons - 1-10 active warheads

Undeclared nuclear weapons states outside NPT

  • Israeli Nuclear Weapons - 75-200 active warheads[4]

Former Nuclear Weapons States

  • South African Nuclear Weapons

Non-Nuclear Weapons States who have been suspected of having nuclear weapons programs

  • Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program
  • Libyan Nuclear Weapons Program[5]

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

[edit] Resources

  1. ^ "Nuclear Disarmament," US Policy World. http://www.uspw.org/. [1]
  2. ^ http://armscontrolcenter.org/about/ Center for Arms Control and Non Proliferation:About Us
  3. ^ "Nuclear Disarmament," US Policy World. http://www.uspw.org/. [2]
  4. ^ Norris, Robert S., William Arkin, Hans M. Kristensen, and Joshua Handler. "Israeli nuclear forces, 2002," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 58:5 (September/October 2002): 73-75. Excerpt online.
  5. ^ "Nuclear Disarmament," US Policy World. http://www.uspw.org/. [3]