User talk:Nowimnthing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Indiana in the American Civil War is currently being reviewed for good article status. (22 May 2008)
Indiana General Assembly is currently being reviewed for good article status. (5 June 2008)

1 Welcome
2 Information science
3 Template:User wife
4 Evolution: "is believed to" vs. "may"
5 Young Adult Science Fiction Title
6 Fossil record
7 Evolution
8 Fossils
9 German Library Reference Service
10 Hello, and Could You Please Help Me?
11 Fair use
12 creationism article
13 "Human evolution fossils"
14 Thanks for the award
15 Requested moves Rhodesian man
16 revert on delphi
17 Orphaned fair use image (Image:Taung13.jpg)
18 Orphaned fair use image (Image:Taung1l.jpg)
19 Orphaned fair use image (Image:Taung1max.jpg)
20 Orphaned fair use image (Image:Taung1man.jpg)
21 Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sts53.jpg)
22 Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sts5l.jpg)
23 Orphaned fair use image (Image:TM1517a3.jpg)
24 Orphaned fair use image (Image:TM1517b1.jpg)
25 Unspecified source for Image:Mauer3.jpg
26 Fair use rationale for Image:1470f.jpg
27 Unspecified source for Image:1470f.jpg
28 Orphaned non-free media (Image:WT17ksmf.jpg)
29 Hello!
30 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ER406f.jpg
31 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Knmer3733f.jpg
32 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ng6f.jpg
33 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WT17ksmf.jpg
34 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SK46l.jpg
35 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sk48f.jpg
36 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Skhul5 f.jpg
37 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sts71 f.jpg
38 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TM1517a2.jpg
39 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Zinjf.jpg
40 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wadjf.jpg
41 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Al129knee.jpg
42 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:17400f.jpg
43 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1805fmax.jpg
44 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1813f.jpg
45 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:732f.jpg
46 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kabwecraniumf.jpg
47 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lachapf.jpg
48 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Laferrf.jpg
49 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lemousf.jpg
50 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AL200f.jpg
51 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oh24f.jpg
52 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oh73.jpg
53 Image copyright problem with Image:3883f.jpg

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Nowimnthing, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sophia 21:58, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Information science

Hi, do you know how closely the "information science" as descibed in information science and the "information science" in library science are related? Cheers, —Ruud 14:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

I would support the suggested merge between Informatics and Information science to help clear this up. Informatics/Information science basically has more to do with IT/computer science. There is a bit of overlap esp when you get into human/computer interaction. The information science wing of Library science has made it even more confusing as those are studies coming from Library science but dealing more with IT issues. For example you can get either a MLS (Master of Library Science) or a MIS (Master of Information Science) from the same school of Library and Information Science. The MIS usually just focuses more on computer/tech classes while the MLS focuses on more traditional library classes. That being said there is a separate School of Informatics where you can get a MS in a sub-discipline so there is some distinction there. Hope that helps. Nowimnthing 14:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template:User wife

Hi, I notice that you are using Template:User wife, which has been moved to {{User:UBX/wife}}. The link currently being used on your page is a cross-namespace redirect and will probably not last. It may be advisable to change the link. Thanks. —Mi ra 05:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Evolution: "is believed to" vs. "may"

I'm an open-minded skeptic of speciation claims. I'd be honored if you could provide me a citation or two about speciation having been observed in the lab. Folks I argue with claim that it hasn't. Lou Sander 16:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC) (Former 10-year public library trustee)

Sure, our article on Speciation has a few, though I will admit it is a bit bare. More are found [1], [2] and [3]. Nowimnthing 20:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC) copied to 2 talk pages

Interesting. I read a bunch of it, and if it's true, it seems as though there HAVE been cases of species being created. It also seems that almost all of them have been (for want of a better word) "intelligently designed." But that doesn't account for the wildflowers.

I wonder why, when important people assert that there haven't been any new species, the response is either like hornets disturbed, or Sunnis vs. Shiites, or (at least as I've seen it) something like "oh, we have jillions of examples." Maybe they should pick a few good ones and stick with them, so doubters can try to strike them down (Piltdown wildflowers?). Thanks again for the citations. Lou Sander 21:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Young Adult Science Fiction Title

Regarding the question you'd posted on the Humanities Ref Desk a week or two ago ... User:Bmk came up with the "The Forgotten Door" by Alexander Key, and that is most definitely the book that I recall reading. I think I'll check my own local library to see if they have a copy of it. --LarryMac 16:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fossil record

Hello Nowimnthing, I'm Aeon from the Mediation Cabal. Wing Nut has requested Mediation in order to settle disputes over Fossil record. Please respond back to me if you are willing to talk this out in Mediation. The Mediation Cabal is informal so there is nothing to lose. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 04:18, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure either if the article is about to be merged then this problem would become moot. I will inform Wing Nut. Thanks. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 13:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Evolution

Again, I am not trying to debate the merits of the IC argument. I am simply saying that according to WP:NPOV, we should at least present the viewpoint. —Aiden 16:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

The article on evolution is primarily an article about science not an article on creation beliefs. As such creationism is not relevent. The social effects of the theory are relevent and are mentioned in the article. Barnaby dawson 17:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fossils

Dear Nowimnthing: You clearly watch and contribute to the fossils page. I took the afternoon off to work on it, but expended time instead on the religion issue. FYI, my playground for fossils is a sandbox where things will begin to materialize. Please feel free to play there too. Perhaps later we can move the sandbox for others to dabble in.Likearock 21:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] German Library Reference Service

Hi! de:Wikipedia:Bibliotheksrecherche has excellent offers (from patrons, not librarians!) but nearly no customers. Should questions concerning English library materials posed on the Reference Desk or would it make sense to establish an own page? Greetings from Germany --Historiograf 03:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hello, and Could You Please Help Me?

Hello. I am the one who contributed the bit about Origin of Light. I'm sorry that I do not know what vanity press is. I am also sorry to hear that you had such a nasty experience with an author from Publish America! Let me assure you that I will not fight with you. Thank you for answering my question about vanity press. I am not self published with Publish America, I didn ot pay them, but they paid me to publish my book. I hope that this helps you o answer my query. Thanks! ~S

[edit] Fair use

See criteria 3 and 8 in particular, articles should use the least amount of fair use material possible. Taking 5 images of the same thing from the Smithsonian isn't fair and in the manner in which they were used in the articles didn't add anything more than one image.--Peta 13:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

That is rubbish, you can provide people with the necessary information by inlcuding a single image and including a link to the webpage from where you took the images. We are trying to build a free content encyclopedia, non-commercial use is not useful for people that resue wikipedia material, fair use is not free use. Please don't upload more images than are necessary.--Peta 23:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Your only point it that you want to have all the pictures. Including them all is not fair.--Peta 00:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] creationism article

Thanks for your concern. If you believe my additions were inappropriate, uncyclopaedic or plain false then I will not resubmit them. Looking at your user boxes I’ll assume you’re not doing this purely on an anti-scientific/pro-religious basis. Can I ask what the specific inadequacies of my additions to the article where though? Where they really such a “mess”? The term mess does seem unreasonable, but the last time I made such minor and trivial changes to an article related to religion they were deemed (by one single user at least) to be rubbish! Guess you’re not as passionate as him. Thanks. Miller 19:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Marxism-Leninism and Communism where inspired by evolution? OK, I understand what you mean now. I still don’t really understand what I did wrong though. (I can’t see your account name on the history of the article though) Miller 19:45, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "Human evolution fossils"

...just doesn't sound right, does it? If you really wanted to, you could make it "List of fossils of human evolution". However, arguments from genetics suggest that none of the fossils we find are likely to be direct ancestors of modern humans, so if you really are going to be picky, you could say that the fossils, when alive, did not significantly contribute to human evolution anyway. What's the way out? "List of hominin fossils"? - Samsara (talk • contribs) 11:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for the award

See, it pays of contributing to this site while at work (all my edits are done while my reactions are incubating).--Roland Deschain 17:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Requested moves Rhodesian man

You recently removed the move tag for that page, I guess I was the only person interested in the page move. I still think it needs to be done. It would be a move over a redirect but the redirect has some history so I need an admin to help. Can you do that or should I go back to the Requested moves page? Again the requested move is old name Rhodesian Man to new name Homo rhodesiensis in order to make it consistent with all the other species pages (Rhodesian Man refers to a specific fossil while the page is about the species.) I am working on creating pages for several fossils and that info will eventually end up there. Thanks Nowimnthing 14:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure what happened to that move request. An anon tagged the talk page eight months ago and then added the entry to WP:RM but it was lost somehow. Apparently no one took it seriously and removed it from WP:RM and then left the move tag there. I found it going through crusty forgotten move tags. Yes, please do add the move request again if you want - it just slipped through the cracks somehow. (I've removed dozens or hundreds of abandoned move tags lately so it's not unheard of) —Wknight94 (talk) 17:03, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] revert on delphi

Whoops! Sorry, your edit got flagged as vandalism incorrectly. I apologise and have restored the edit. --Sagaciousuk ^(talk) 19:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Taung13.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Taung13.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Taung1l.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Taung1l.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Taung1max.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Taung1max.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Taung1man.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Taung1man.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sts53.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sts53.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Sts5l.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sts5l.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:TM1517a3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TM1517a3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:TM1517b1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TM1517b1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Mauer3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mauer3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 19:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:1470f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1470f.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 00:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:1470f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1470f.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 00:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:WT17ksmf.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WT17ksmf.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello!

Hello Nowimnthing! You do not know me. But I know you. I joined Wikipedia on October 1, 2007. Before that I made some edits as an anonymous user. I first saw Wikipedia in 2006 and became interested in Wikipedia in mid 2007. I saw your user page in 2006. At that time I knew almost nothing about Wikipedia. I am almost 100% sure that your user page was the first user page I saw on Wikipedia! I was wondering what was a user page doing in an encyclopedia. Today, after more than a year, when I saw your user page again, I became excited! I wish you all the best. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 09:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ER406f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ER406f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Knmer3733f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Knmer3733f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ng6f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ng6f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WT17ksmf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WT17ksmf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SK46l.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SK46l.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sk48f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sk48f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Skhul5 f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Skhul5 f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sts71 f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sts71 f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TM1517a2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TM1517a2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Zinjf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Zinjf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wadjf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wadjf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Al129knee.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Al129knee.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:17400f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:17400f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1805fmax.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1805fmax.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1813f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1813f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:732f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:732f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kabwecraniumf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kabwecraniumf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lachapf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lachapf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Laferrf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Laferrf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lemousf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lemousf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AL200f.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:AL200f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oh24f.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Oh24f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oh73.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Oh73.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:3883f.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:3883f.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

Image:992l.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:23, 20 April 2008 (UTC)