User talk:Noway419

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Noway419 (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

September 2007

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Halo 3. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — TKD::Talk 17:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Halo 3, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — TKD::Talk 17:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent insertion of text that does not adhere to neutral point of view at Halo 3. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

I should also note that you also violated the three-revert rule, an offense for which you have been previously blocked. Please stop edit warring, and bear in mind that we depend on third-party reliable sources, not Wikipedia editors, for points of view. — TKD::Talk 17:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dumluckart.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dumluckart.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JOELPACK.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:JOELPACK.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "ok i learned the wikipedia rules which i have never read b4 and i realize my mistakes now and think i deserve another chance to edit, most of my edits are just to rpevent vandalism from my fav bands page so im sorry if there was any rule i violated but i no them now and it wont happen again so some1 unban me now plz Noway419 (talk) 03:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "Obviousness of the similarity of the two accounts aside, your behavior here (changing others' comments) has been disruptive. — — TKD::Talk 04:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Note to admins User was blocked as a sock puppet, not for inserting POV material. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


By the way, I have a life. If I had no life, I'd be dead, wouldn't I? And one does not have to be an admin to place a sock puppet tag on a userpage. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 04:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

when did i say i was tlaking about u...Noway419 (talk) 04:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
It's pretty obvious. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 04:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. Please use this talk page in a constructive, civil manner, instead of disrupting. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to this talk page, the page will be temporarily protected, and you would be unable to communicate with others. Do not remove the sock puppet tag. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 04:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You must use this talk page in a constructive, civil manner, instead of disrupting. If you make any more unconstructive edits to this talk page, the page will be temporarily protected, and you would be unable to communicate with others.