User talk:Nowah Balloon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] R&J characters

I agree with you about the state of these articles. It would be nice to get them all to GA status. I'll see if i can help you out a bit. Wrad 18:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey, about Tybalt and Lady Capulet, I restored that fact because it is cited at the end of the paragraph by a pretty good source (scholarly, peer-reviewed, the whole shebang). If scholars respect it enough to print it, than we can't really fight it much. Wrad 19:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Shine_some_light.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Shine_some_light.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 20:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
The Great Cold Distance
Against Me! EP
Pat Heywood
Hot Water Music
Shakespearean tragedy
Start Static
Taskforce
The Loved Ones (American band)
Holly Vincent
USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-A)
Whisper (song)
Palm Trees and Power Lines
List of concluded webcomics
Lagwagon
Dave Meltzer
No Trigger
Talk Show Host
Live in Minneapolis
Hapgood
Cleanup
Date Movie
West Memphis 3
Star-crossed
Merge
Nothing Nice To Say
Janken
Google Watch
Add Sources
Folk punk
Romeo and Juliet (1968 film)
Henry IV, Part 1
Wikify
Kevin Seconds
Nino Rota
Collateral (film)
Expand
Montague, Texas
Distraction
Eugene R. Black

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vividavis.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Vividavis.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tomsfirstdemo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Tomsfirstdemo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Peer Reviews

Happy New Year, Nowah Balloon! Remember me? Y'know, JS from Talk:Benvolio? Anyway, I'm registered now, and, though I realise that this might be a tad off-subject from the Shakespeare-related pages you usually contribute to, I thought I could solicit your assistance. I've submitted two articles for peer review, and thought that you might like to critique them:

  • Duck Soup. I've listed this article for peer review because, even though I and other editors have contributed much information and references, I'm certain that there are other aspects of this classic film that have yet to be covered. I'd like to hear feedback from you, so that I can get help in improving this (and other Marx Brothers films) quality.
  • Princess Leia Organa. I've listed this article for peer review because it right now seems oddly cluttered and, despite a lot of references as of now, lacks reliable source citations. Although I've already requested another peer review, as long as it helps the articles get better, I've got the time. Comments and suggestions are appreciated, as this should help me in expanding other Star Wars-centric articles.

If you have the time, it'd be great if you could look over those two articles and assess their flaws and weaknesses. Thanks, and a Happy New Year to you! — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 03:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Sticklers

I prodded the article. If you don't want it deleted, please prove how the band meets the notability guideline for music listed at the top of the page. —Viriditas | Talk 14:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)