Talk:Now That's What I Call Music! 67 (U.K. series)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

If we can't speculate here, where can we speculate?

  • On an internet discussion forum ([1] should suffice). Or on your blog. Or in your house. Or in your head. But not in any place to do with an encyclopaedia. Kinitawowi 15:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I don't have a blog,house or a head
  • lolz

Contents

[edit] Track listing

Is there anything remotely resembling a source anywhere for the full tracklisting of a compilation album that isn't due for release for another month?! Kinitawowi 11:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Why's not Sophie Ellis-Bextor in this album?!

I think it's a shame that Sophie Ellis-Bextor's second single "Me and My Imagination" is not included in the album Now 67, because it was a Massive Hit single on the UK Dance Charts, and it peaked at #23 on the UK Singles Chart, due to a technical fault of iTunes, so I don't know why she's not included on this compilation. Paul McCartney released a single called "Dance Tonight", and that single only peaked at #26 on the UK Singles Chart, and that's a lower position than #23 of "Me and My Imagination". I don't understand! Hope "Today The Sun's On Us" appears on the next Now compilation!!!

[edit] NOW 68 is ready for you predictions!

and its such a shame that sophie among others didn't make it onto now 67, notibly kaiser chiefs, scissor sisters,killers,fratellis,hoosiers and cascada

  • And now it's unready again. Take it to a forum. Kinitawowi 16:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I spent all day making Now 68 page asshole
  • put a lock on the Now 68 page and be done with it
    • I tried that. They basically refused and suggested I take it to deletion instead, so I did. Kinitawowi 17:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • there are no Now 68 forums at present
    • Then start one. Or start a thread over at the NowMusic Forums in the Now Members Only forum. (There is a forum there for Now! 68, but it's locked until some information becomes available.) But talk pages are intended for discussing the affiliated article, not for general gossip. Kinitawowi 17:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • now 68 will be released on 19th November, its always released a week later than its American counterpart, but make the page late Oct, whan the cover should be released;) also theres a cover design for now 68 now!

79.67.252.86 16:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trivial Trivia

The inlay booklet contains a mistake, stating that the Klaxons It's Not Over Yet is their second hit of the year. It is actually their third, after Golden Skans and Gravity's Rainbow.

To me this seems an odd statement. Particularly as it is unsourced. Gravity's Rainbow, according to its page, only reached #35 in the charts... does that make it a hit? I don't realy know how these things are defined, but I thought I'd note my feelings here to see how others feel. JiMternet 14:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Now 67.jpg

Image:Now 67.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)