Talk:Now That's What I Call Music! 25 (U.S. series)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
That's retarded that it got deleted.
WHY??????????!!!!!!!!!!
Nick 02:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Monkey97
hi! im the reason it got deleted. but im knda pissed myself it was a joke and i meant to take it off but it got deleted. sorry but it was kinda fun!!! whoever wrote it do it again i need to see somthing really important on it thanks!!!!
Contents |
[edit] Getting it Back
Is there anyway to get it back? 72.82.22.247 07:40, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- From barnesandnoble.com
Now, Vol. 25
Album Details Release Date: 07/17/2007 Label: UTV RECORDS Catalog No.: 000905502 UPC: 602517348172
If you look at the page for Now That's What I Call Music! 67 (UK Series)[1], you will see that although there is no information on it, the page still exists. Now 25 should have a similar page.
[edit] Cover on Amazon
Amazon has an image of the cover. [2]
I think it's about time this page be unlocked. Enough "official" information is coming through. Just prevent or delete track listings people enter unless it comes from a verifiable source.
-
- So, we can't put provisional tracklistings? 72.82.17.14 23:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- No, that's exactly why it was deleted in the first place.
-
-
-
-
- Somebody just made a tracklisting on NOW 24's page. 72.82.1.206
-
-
75.117.127.62 20:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)This page needs to be restored. Someone has already created a new Now 25 page that redirects to the Now 25 U.S. version instead of the disambiguation page which screws up the entire format of the Now series, the way it's set up on wikipedia. You can check it out here [3]. We know it's coming out next month, the least that can be done is put up the album work (as listed on Amazon.com) and the release date...deleting this alternative page in the progress.
[edit] Recreation and move...and collateral damage in the name of protection
I found the Now 25 article in good condition and supported by information at amazon.com—at which point I moved it to the proper title for the series and then discovered that title is protected. Working on fixing it. —C.Fred (talk) 01:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed. Message me on my talk page if it gets rebroken or there's a problem. —C.Fred (talk) 01:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I'm confused...
How did some songs get Vetoed off of the NOW 25? They skipped "This Ain't a Scene", "What Goes Around", "This Is Why I'm Hot" and "I'm a Flirt", not to mention no Nelly Furtado, Rihanna, Hinder or Maroon 5, where those songs were way more successful. How did this happen? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yellowstone County Girl (talk • contribs) 02:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC).
- How do we know they were ever under consideration to be on there? Plus, it might come down to a question over getting the rights from their labels. —C.Fred (talk) 02:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rasheeda
OK. This is going out to whoever keeps on deleting her name. Even thought she is not featured on the cover, she should still be here. Check out NOW 24. will.i.am isn't featured on the cover either, but he is still added on to the tracklisting. The point I'm trying to make is that even though Rasheeda isn't featured on the cover, her name should still be there. Yellowstone County Girl 03:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Is Rasheeda on the track listing though? More to the point, where can I see a published source that shows she appears on the track, short of going to a music retailer to look at a physical copy of the album? Before release, we had used Amazon.com as the source, and IIRC, she wasn't listed there. —C.Fred (talk) 17:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- Rasheeda isn't on the racklisting on the CD, however, on the MIMS album I have, she is listed as being a contributor, so that is why I put her there. I know Wikipedia isn't a reliable source, but, under the song, she's listed as a contributor. Yellowstone County Girl 00:10, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Now 25.jpg
Image:Now 25.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)