User talk:Novell73

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Welcome 2 March 2008 3 Speedy deletion of Allegria 4 Speedy deletion of Allegria painting 5 Speedy deletion of "Acanthia" 6 Speedy deletion of Amorette painting 7 Painting articles 8 AfD nomination of Vincent Calavari

[edit] Welcome

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Damion Calavari has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Adambro (talk) 19:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Damion Calavari constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 19:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC))

[edit] Speedy deletion of Allegria

A tag has been placed on Allegria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 23:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Allegria painting

A tag has been placed on Allegria painting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 23:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of "Acanthia"

A page you created, Acanthia, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

No context. Very short articles with little or no context for their statements.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you J.delanoy^gabs_adds 23:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Amorette painting

A tag has been placed on Amorette painting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 23:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Painting articles

I see that you are creating a series of one sentence stub articles which assert that such and such painting is done by a certain painter. These are unlikely to survive very long without some references to show that the paintings meet standards for notability as given in WP:N. Statements should be WP:verifiable and substantiated by WP:reliable sources. Regards. Edison (talk) 23:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Vincent Calavari

An editor has nominated Vincent Calavari, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Calavari and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)