User talk:Novanut35

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Novanut35, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Fxyguy 01:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Pavilion-floor-250.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pavilion-floor-250.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Pennbrook Middle School. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bencherlite 01:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Answer

Listen, buddy, why don't you go back to your Villanova games and lightboards and leave the editing to others.--Fxyguy 02:23, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pennbrook

Wikipedia has strict rules on article content: for one thing, a food fight is an unreferenced, unnecessary piece of information that is really not needed in the article. Secondly, the school may have a theater, but unless it's really, really famous for something, it needn't be mentioned in the article. These sections will continue to be removed either by me or another user because they do not meet Wikipedia's standards for articles. Thanks. --Captain Wikify Argh! 18:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

It doesn't matter what the students think; no one owns their own Wikipedia article. Everything that's here must follow the Manual of Style. The food fight may have happened and it may have been a big deal, but it is non notable and therefore should not be included in the article. The theater was removed by the same logic: because it is not a famous (or notable) organization, it cannot be in the article. Articles need to be concise and only contain necessary information. --Captain Wikify Argh! 18:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I can say it's non notable because of years of experience. There is not a single article on Wikipedia about a specific school that contains a section on a food fight. The reason for this is because food fights are non notable. As far as references are concerned, I have not given you instructions because it's not necessary. I could reference an article about myself, but that certainly doesn't make me notable. You don't need references because you don't need the section in the first place. Also, please watch your tone when typing replies - I don't appreciate snide comments and talking in such a way certainly won't help you. --Captain Wikify Argh! 18:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] How To

How Do i source it then?Novanut35 19:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Novanut35 (talk • contribs)

To add a source to the article Pennbrook Middle School, you could use a newspaper or any reliable source. If you find a source, paste it in the talk page and I will insert it into the article. Hope this helps. --Tom 19:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

The problem is, there is no source. I am it, it was a first hand account, and I know that it may not be there for it. I read other articles that didnt seem like it had sources either, so whats with them?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Novanut35 (talk • contribs)

Novanut, if there is no source for the material, it should not be added, period. I agree that there is ALOT of material that is not properly sourced, but that material can be removed as well as far as I am concerned. This project is about gathering material that is ALREADY established. What you are reporting is original research and should not be included. Also, please sign your posts with four(4) tildes (~). Thanks! --Tom 19:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok, can i source it myself. ANother user said you could. Can I do that, or have a peer source it?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Novanut35 (talk • contribs)

No, you can't source it yourself. That other user was incorrect if he told you that. Please read the links I provided above and PLEASE sign your posts with 4 of these ~. Thanks, --Tom 19:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Source=www.npenn.orgNovanut35 19:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Thats a link to the NorthPenn school district?? Does it mention the food fight? --Tom 19:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)ps, thanks for signing your post :)
I couldn't find anything. Nevertheless, when someone says, "Source it yourself," it does not mean to write down your own account as a source - it means to find a reliable source to substantiate your claims. The paragraph at the moment could well be false and it could put the school in an undeserved bad light. x42bn6 Talk Mess 20:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Three revert rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pennbrook Middle School. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.


I'd also highly suggest laying off the personal attacks at User talk:Spica. Thanks. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lincoln Financial Field references

I noticed that you had said that you had the links for information that you had put down in the article. If you can, go ahead and add the <ref>link in here</ref>. I do belive what you have put down, as I have read about the stuff, but it would be helpful if you provide links for references. Thanks :) Whammies Were Here 08:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Even if the links are to pages that you have to pay to see news from the past, its perfectly acceptable to use them as references. There are pages all over wikipedia where that is the situation with a reference, so if you have those links, go right ahead and put them on too.
Also, if you do reply, reply on my talk page, but dont worry, im not mad at you for it. I will warn you in advance though, some editors though can be a bit protective of their main pages. But as I said, Im not mad over it. Whammies Were Here 11:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Andrew Brightman

A tag has been placed on Andrew Brightman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 00:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Pennbrook Middle School

Pennbrook Middle School, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Pennbrook Middle School satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pennbrook Middle School and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Pennbrook Middle School during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Spellcast 14:55, 27 September 2007 (UTC)