User talk:Nourelshamy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Nourelshamy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  AKRadeckiSpeaketh 16:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Al-Batouti

Before you post a disputed tag on an article, you need to clearly explain on the talk page what is disputed. When you tag an entire article, that implies the entire article is disputed. If you question a particular statement, consider using a {{fact}} tag at the end of that statment. Regardless, though, and especially when an article is thoroughly referenced, you need to provide detailed information and preferrably supporting data the backs your objections. Thanks for the efforts to make this a better encyclopedia, though. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 16:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok, you ignored my advice above, and re-added the disputed tag, without telling us what you're disputing and providing sources to support your concerns. I've again removed the tag. Re-adding it without proper followup and good sources will be considered POV pushing, and will lead to an escalation of warnings. Please don't go there, it's not worth it. If you have something materially to add to this article, please do it, otherwise, please leave it alone. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 13:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
The neutrality and factual accuracy of this article or section are disputed.
First I'm sorry for not posting the reasons the first time, I didnt know I had to, I am new wikipedian.
Second, about the article, I have no objections against the facts that are given, but simply this is the U.S theory and the conclusions of an investigation that did not last much after the disaster.
Egyptians do not believe or accept this. Egyptian officials have denied these incidents and denied that the disaster was an act of terror or suicide by Gameel Al Batouti, they have reasons to believe that the crash was a direct result of a mailfunction in the aircraft tail (something in arabic that is transilated literaly to "elevation plates of the tail" I'm not sure if this is its true name and translation to english).
Egypt Air officially denied on 25/06/2001; a report by Newsweek saying that Egyptian investigators have secretly announced that they have accepted the U.S point of view and theory which suggests hat the reserve copilot of EgyptAir Flight 990 deliberately plunged the jetliner into the Atlantic Ocean last fall. The Egyptians have hired legal and technical experts in an effort to discredit the U.S theory and to find out what really happened.
Furthermore, and away from the official announcements, most egyptians believe that it was not an act of terror or suicide, Al Batouti family said on a T.V interview that the man was totally sane and professional and had no problems an was not an extremist. Egyptians agree with the mailfuntion theory, but some few even have more dramatic theories, one directly accusing the U.S of shooting down the plane confirming that there was a bundle of flame which hit the aircraft moments before it crashed, and they say that the U.S have shot it down because there was a highly trained Egyptian Special Forces group on board which if returned to Egypt will cause a military unbalance with Israel. Others say that the U.S investigation served the Boeing Corporation interests causing the avoidance of paying compensations to the victims.
Personally I go with the mailfunction theory, but this doesnt matter, all I want to do is to post these thoeries Egyptians point of view along the U.S theory, I have no objections on posting the U.S theory or what is already posted.
I want to note that the cause of the disaster is stated on the wikipedia Flight 990 page as Disputed.
Thank you. ñÅñÑü ( Talk | Contributions ) 11:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
You seem to still be insisting on tagging this article, even though it has been explained to you that the tag is inappropriate. You are free to believe that the cause of the disaster as determined by the NTSB is wrong, however your POV belief does not qualify as a factual assertion that the biographical article is not neutral. Please stop adding the tag, or your edits will be considered disruptive. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 13:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lucifer

Again, you've added a tag without supporting it on the talk page. You can't do that. I've removed the tag. Please add it back only if you can support it. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 13:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

I've added my support on the article's talk page. ñÅñÑü ( Talk | Contributions ) 11:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ahmed_Ezz.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ahmed_Ezz.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

I dont know what to do about the picture, I dont think it is copyrighted, its an image of a famous Egyptian politician, I've stated the place where I got the image from, I need some help here.
All pictures and texts are copyrighted, this one is probably from Enigma magazine, and is © 2007 Enigma Magazine. Fair use is disputable because it is possible for someone to go take a picture of him. -- lucasbfr talk 07:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Safwat_El-Sherif.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Safwat_El-Sherif.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Maamoura

Ahlan Nour; I made these changes because, as you clearly stated in the article, Maamoura Beach is not the same as Maamoura (I'm from Alex too, and I know that Maamoura el Shate2 is different from Maamoura el Balad). Also, please refrain from using "el" in the name, because it makes the search much harder and is sort of redundant (for instance: el-Maamoura should be just Maamoura). I guess we should just create a new article entitled Maamoura, Alexandria to which Maamoura would redirect. I'm not sure about your 2nd questions concerning the citations. Did you copy some info from somewhere else and put in on Wikipedia? Thanks! --Lanternix 13:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Alexandria

Somebody is persistant in trying to add the slavic name of Alexandria into the article, thanks for deleting as there is no purpose for its inclution. Just be aware of it, since you probably visit the article more often than myself. --Maggas 3:05, 8 July 2007 (ACST)

[edit] E-mail

Hi. Please set a valid e-mail address in your user preferences so that I can e-mail you. See help. --Meno25 15:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eftekasat

Hi there, what's up?! Look, i wanted to ask you if you can state your opinion on this matter. Also please do visit those two pages, Eftekasat and Mouled Sidi El-Latini, to obtain a better understanding of the band! Thanks for your help. :) Maged M. Mahfouz (talk) 19:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)