User talk:Notheruser

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peace. -- Notheruser 01:21, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)

I was wondering about the source of the information for the edit you made on transponder codes I have never heard of alternating between 7700 and 7500. also most newer transponders do not have a standby flip switch making this rather impractical.

ps: thanks for the edit, I tend to use jargon.

Contents 1 Article Licensing 2 9/11 open questions 3 Thanks 4 Visual Basic Classic Wikibook 5 Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can 6 Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can 7 Broadcaster.com 8 Award 9 Speedy deletion of Tangible investments

[edit] Article Licensing

I was looking at the U.S. city and county articles and noticed that you've made some number of changes. I've chosen to multi-license all of the rambot contributions under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License so that other projects, such as WikiTravel, can use our articles. I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all your contributions (or at minimum those on the geographic articles) so that we can keep most of the articles available under the multi-license. Many users use the {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} template (or even {{MultiLicensePD}} for public domain) on their user page, but there are other templates for other options at Template messages/User namespace. If you only prefer using the GFDL, I understand, but I thought I'd at least ask, just in case. If you do want to do it, simply just copy and paste one of the above two templates into your user page and it will allow us to track those users who have done it. For example:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. State]], [[U.S. County]], or [[U.S. City]] article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain (which many people do or don't like to do, see Wikipedia:Multi-licensing), you could replace {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} with {{MultiLicensePD}}. Of course you appear to be inactive, so I don't even know if and when you will ever read this. -- Ram-Man 13:46, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] 9/11 open questions

Hi,

I noticed you are a successful editor for the "9/11 domestic conspiracy theory" page.

I have a page that is being voted on for deletion. My page has links that may be useful to your article.

However, I am not a successful editor. The users who are voting for deletion of my page are also reverting all minor edits or inserts that I make to other pages, in a tag-team fashion. Therefore I cannot try to edit the above mentioned article that you edit.

If you want more links to support your article, you are in a position to harvest them from my article prior to its deletion. My article is called "9/11 open questions".

Best of success with your article.

Bogusstory 20:58, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for reverting the recent vandalism to my user page! --Canderson7 22:44, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

• And to mine as well! — Knowledge Seeker দ 02:13, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Visual Basic Classic Wikibook

I see you have contributed to the Visual Basic article on Wikipedia. Any chance you would like to join in editing the wikibook: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:Visual_Basic_Classic? --Kjwhitefoot 09:54, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

[edit] Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

[edit] Broadcaster.com

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Broadcaster.com, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --VS ^talk 06:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Award

		The I Edited Jimbo Wales' Userpage Barnstar
		Notheruser has edited the userpage of Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, without vandalizing it. To do so, just fix a typo or something right here.

I would like to present to you the I Edited Jimbo Wales' Userpage Barnstar! — ComputerGuy890100^{Talk to me}_{What I've done to help Wikipedia} 23:15, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

yo whatsup man. long time no speak —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.237.253.44 (talk) 22:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Tangible investments

A tag has been placed on Tangible investments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Prashanthns (talk) 23:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)