User talk:NotabilityMan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please cease and desist from removing the Notability template without reasonable justification

Please cease and desist from removing the Notability template from the articles Mary Kirchoff, Kate Novak, Chris Pierson and Don Perrin as these articles do not have any reliable secondary sources. Claims of notability must adhere to Wikipedia's policy on verifiability; it is not enough to simply assert that these articles meet the notability criteria of WP:BIO without substantiating those claims with reliable sources. There is no reasonable justification for removing the template which was put there to address this problem. Note that is not to say that that these topic are non-notable; it is just that the state of the article as this time has warranted a Notability cleanup template so that editors and readers alike are alerted to this issue.

The reason why I ask you to stop removing the template in the strongest possible terms is that you appear to be POV pushing, as the explanations for removing the template are not supported by the notability guideline WP:BIO and WP:RS which applies to these articles. Unless you adding reliable secondary sources to the article, I would be grateful if you would restore the template immediately.--Gavin Collins (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This is the only account I have."

Decline reason: "Too bad. Not a valid reason to unblock. Your edits were disruptive and, as your username (hardly one a newcomer would pick, I doubt) suggest, a violation of WP:POINT --Daniel Case (talk) 03:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Editing patterns very similar to Grawp. The Evil Spartan (talk) 02:26, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Writing multiple novels read by hundreds of thousands of people demonstrates notability. How are Jmlk's edits justified?--NotabilityMan (talk) 03:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, really? My edits were disruptive? Have you looked at Gavin Collins's? Jeff Grubb has written several novels, at least one of which was a New York Times best-seller. Jack Merridew is removing an image from an article in order to get it deleted.[1] Kate Novak has written multiple novels read by hundreds of thousands of people. Gavin Collins is removing references in order to insert an {{unreferenced}} template, thus violating Wikipedia:Verifiability.[2] Chris Pierson has written multiple novels read by hundreds of thousands of people. Mary Kirchoff has written multiple novels read by hundreds of thousands of people. Don Perrin has written multiple novels read by hundreds of thousands of people. Gavin Collins left a comment on my page[3], so I left one on his page. [4]--NotabilityMan (talk) 04:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I think Gavin Collins is a sock puppet of Jack Merridew; are you going to block them, too?--NotabilityMan (talk) 04:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Enough, Grawp. You can wikilawyer and complain all you want; but you have shown yourself to be unreliable in following Wikipedia's policies, and as such are not entitled to edit here. In plainer language, buzz off. The Evil Spartan (talk) 04:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
What are you talking about? This is my only account. How the fuck are these articles not notable? Can you fucking read?--NotabilityMan (talk) 04:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
nb: what a rich day for such bad faith. --Jack Merridew 13:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, really? My edits were disruptive? Have you looked at Gavin Collins's? Jeff Grubb has written several novels, at least one of which was a New York Times best-seller. Jack Merridew is removing an image from an article in order to get it deleted.[5] Kate Novak has written multiple novels read by hundreds of thousands of people. Gavin Collins is removing references in order to insert an {{unreferenced}} template, thus violating Wikipedia:Verifiability.[6] Chris Pierson has written multiple novels read by hundreds of thousands of people. Mary Kirchoff has written multiple novels read by hundreds of thousands of people. Don Perrin has written multiple novels read by hundreds of thousands of people. Gavin Collins left a comment on my page[7], so I left one on his page. [8]

I think Gavin Collins is a sock puppet of Jack Merridew; are you going to block them, too? --NotabilityMan (talk) 04:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

ya, it really helps to repeat your shite. --Jack Merridew 13:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. <3 bunny 04:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you please point out where the fuck I was attacking them?! Because it seems like they are attacking me.--NotabilityMan (talk) 04:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Just because you feel like you're being attacked doesn't give you the right to attack back. <3 bunny 04:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Yes, it does. But where did I attack? I didn't attack anyone.--NotabilityMan (talk) 04:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC)