Talk:Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject European Microstates, which collaborates on articles related to European Microstates. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
[edit] Merge proposal
Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala) and Liechtenstein v. Guatemala are two articles on exactly the same topic with exactly the same scope. They should be merged. The "Nottebohm" name is preferred after reviewing Category:International Court of Justice cases, where most articles' titles are led with a case descriptor, rather than just being in the "plaintiff v. defendant" format. Ipoellet (talk) 21:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Though Liechtenstein v. Guatemala is the older and more complete article, I agree with adding the official ICJ identifier to the title of the article. Too bad the individual starting Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala) didn't just homogenize the format himself. It has been two weeks since your post, I say go ahead with the merge. 67.160.161.176 (talk) 07:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
As the creator of the original page I agree with the merge, and the use of the identifier. I will proceed with the merge on 3 June if there aren't any more comments. --Ondra2 (talk) 09:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
