Talk:Norwood, Ohio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Ohio Portal Norwood, Ohio is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Suggested article edit guidelines: To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification. After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cincinnati, which aims to improve all articles related to Cincinnati and the Greater Cincinnati area.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
High	This article is on a subject of High-importance within Cincinnati articles.

This article is a current selected article candidate on the Ohio portal. A selected article should exemplify Wikipedia's very best work related to Ohio. Please feel free to leave comments.

[edit] Cincinnati project

I decided to include this article in the Cincinnati WikiProject, as most from the area would understand why. (67.142.130.46 17:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Stub / Low Ratings

I've read through several articles regarding Cincinnati communities (I'm sure there are plenty of others), and I'm not quite understanding the whole ratings system - especially when it comes to this article. Reading the criteria for rating an article as "stub" class and "low" importance, it seems not only inaccurate but also rather insulting to those who actually take the time to provide factual and informative items. Perhaps these ratings were established prior to improvements made here (adding pictures, etc.), but even basic and well-defined information is constuctive and useful to the general public. Certainly setting a standard to improve articles is important (and I'm sure most of us have seen some articles in need of improving!), but let's lighten up a bit when people are making a genuine effort to do their part! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.67.250.122 (talk) 21:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC)